Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
Karolinska Institute.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Clinical and Social Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4753-6745
Karolinska Institute.
Karolinska Institute.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: PLOS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 6, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and Aims: Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) is an effective, well-established, but not widely available treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has the potential to increase availability and facilitate dissemination of therapeutic services for SAD. However, ICBT for SAD has not been directly compared with in-person treatments such as CBGT and few studies investigating ICBT have been conducted in clinical settings. Our aim was to investigate if ICBT is at least as effective as CBGT for SAD when treatments are delivered in a psychiatric setting. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with allocation to ICBT (n = 64) or CBGT (n = 62) with blinded assessment immediately following treatment and six months post-treatment. Participants were 126 individuals with SAD who received CBGT or ICBT for a duration of 15 weeks. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) was the main outcome measure. The following non-inferiority margin was set: following treatment, the lower bound of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between groups should be less than 10 LSAS-points. Results: Both groups made large improvements. At follow-up, 41 (64%) participants in the ICBT group were classified as responders (95% CI, 52%-76%). In the CBGT group, 28 participants (45%) responded to the treatment (95% CI, 33%-58%). At post-treatment and follow-up respectively, the 95 % CI of the LSAS mean difference was 0.68-17.66 (Cohens d between group = 0.41) and -22.51-15.69 (Cohens d between group = 0.36) favoring ICBT, which was well within the non-inferiority margin. Mixed effects models analyses showed no significant interaction effect for LSAS, indicating similar improvement across treatments (F = 1.58; df = 2, 219; p = .21). Conclusions: ICBT delivered in a psychiatric setting can be as effective as CBGT in the treatment of SAD and could be used to increase availability to CBT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science (PLoS) , 2011. Vol. 6, no 3
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-67546DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018001ISI: 000288813900027OAI: diva2:411260
Original Publication: Erik Hedman, Gerhard Andersson, Brjann Ljotsson, Erik Andersson, Christian Ruck, Ewa Mortberg and Nils Lindefors, Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial, 2011, PLOS ONE, (6), 3, . Licensee: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Available from: 2011-04-18 Created: 2011-04-18 Last updated: 2014-11-28

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(552 kB)673 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 552 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Gerhard
By organisation
Clinical and Social PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 673 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 232 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link