Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hur förbättra utvärderingsverktyget på VUC
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI).
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI).
2009 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Detta examensarbete avser att utvärdera det befintliga kursutvärderingssystemet hos Vägsektorns Utbildningscentrum. (VUC). För att studera detta har vi använt oss av fokusgrupper, intervjuer och auskultation. Studien visar att det uppstår en viss diskrepans mellan vad VUC:s vision säger om hur kursutvärdering ska hanteras och hur kursutvärderingen hanteras idag. En slutsats som vi drar är att den information som genereras av kursutvärderingen motsvarar det syfte VUC har med kursutvärderingen. En annan slutsats är att kursutvärderingen i siginte kan användas till att utveckla kursen ifråga. Med relativt små medel kan detta dock ändras. Dels genom att ställa rätt typ av frågor i kursutvärderingen, samt genom att involvera läraren mer i utvärderingssystemet.

Abstract [en]

This thesis analyzes the existing course evaluation system at VägsektornsUtbildningscentrum (VUC). To be able to study this we have used focus groups, interviews and auscultation. The study shows that there is adiscrepancy on what VUC says about the course evaluation and how the course evaluation is being used today. One conclusion is that that the information that is generated by the course evaluation corresponds to VUC goal with the course evaluation. Another conclusion is that the course evaluation not is usable for developing the course. With relative small means like asking the right question in the course evaluation could change this, and involve the teachers in the course evaluation system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 49 p.
National Category
Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31832OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-31832DiVA: diva2:408825
External cooperation
Vägsektorns utbildningscentrum VUC
Subject / course
Technology and Learning
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Engineering and of Education
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-04-11 Created: 2011-03-28 Last updated: 2012-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(822 kB)36 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 822 kBChecksum SHA-512
3248767d0b7abf1fe52848b84340402134deb7777bd76e4149f13066c3b08011b031bfb99b5773753a97032fd14ae701a487723f85b5af685f08b0133bd988fe
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Engineering Sciences (SCI)
Learning

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 36 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf