Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The history of the concept of grammaticalisation
University of Sheffield.
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The present thesis discusses the history and meaning of the term and concept called grammaticalisation. Linguists usually ascribe the coinage of the term grammaticalisation to Antoine Meillet (1866-1936), who allegedly played a vital role in the history of grammaticalisation. It is also widely acknowledged that grammaticalisation was in some way 'revived' during the 1970s, and that Talmy Givón had an important role in this, as demonstrated by the popularity of the saying 'Today’s morphology is yesterday’s syntax' (taken from one of his articles). I show that Meillet wrote little about grammaticalisation and that he hardly ever used this word, and possibly did not mean for it to be viewed as a term / label. Moreover, the paper in question (Meillet, 1912) is basically a general introduction to a concept which he sees as a continuation of a notion with a long history. In addition, I prove that there are no clear links between Meillet and Givón’s work in the early 1970s. Despite the general acceptance that Meillet coined grammaticalisation, my thesis proves that it could have been coined more than once, and that it does not always mean the same thing to all users. I show that sometimes the term is accompanied by examples which others have used to illustrate lexicalisation, a term which some employ for a process that is seen as the opposite of grammaticalisation. I therefore advocate careful use of our definitions of terminology and concepts, and insist that we should define our notions, instead of letting examples do the work of illustration and definition. Finally, I question whether it is true that grammaticalisation is unidirectional. I research the history of the view that grammaticalisation is a unidirectional process. Grammatical relations can be expressed by different means – e.g. word order, content words becoming grammatical markers, or parts of words being given a function. I believe all these should be compared, in order to improve our knowledge of how languages change and why. I claim that they all represent sub-processes of a superordinate category which I have labelled supergrammaticalisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sheffield: University of Sheffield , 2004. , 453 p.
Keyword [en]
grammaticalisation, unidirectionaty, lexicalisation, history of linguistics, historical linguistics
Keyword [sv]
grammatikalisering, unidirectionality, lexikalisering, lingvistikens historia, historisk lingvistik
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-55932OAI: diva2:407427
Public defence
2004-10-01, Sheffield, 14:45 (English)
Available from: 2011-04-05 Created: 2011-03-30 Last updated: 2011-04-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

FULLTEXT01(1546 kB)1105 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1546 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindström, Therese
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1107 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 194 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link