Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
False recognition: a side effect of right-nostril odor perception
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Research on hemispheric lateralization of olfactory processes is limited and inconclusive. Right-nostril advantage in judging familiarity and intensity has been reported, while the left hemisphere has been suggested to be more involved in hedonic estimation and odor naming. The aim of the present work was to assess suggested differences in perception and memory for odors between stimulated nostrils. The results indicated no significant side-related differences in perceptions of familiarity, hedonics or intensity. In contrast, although hit rates were equal across nostrils, more false alarms were generated when odors were presented in the right nostril. This outcome may reflect easier access to semantic cues in the left compared to the right hemisphere, suggesting the right hemisphere to rely relatively more on emotional cues in odor memory retrieval. The observations of this work draw attention to the problematic encountered in differing conceptual frameworks and methodologies in laterality research.

 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 16 p.
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-54676OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-54676DiVA: diva2:396710
Presentation
2011-01-10, 17:59
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-03-01 Created: 2011-02-10 Last updated: 2011-03-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(263 kB)194 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 263 kBChecksum SHA-512
6b93db3f41831f708ab90020242712e72356a89ee51d60c457c7497fa8a64a5e480d83dac829547c52d57c4dc3fcb8c5f3bfb71883b8bc851ff8c6dc2a4f729e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 194 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 211 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf