Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Likvärdigt bemötande i TV – eller inte: En studie av fyra partiledarutfrågningar i SVT inför valet 2010
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

As the 2010 Swedish election was closing in, there was a discussion about how the media represented the different party leaders in a differential and unfair manner. This study aims to identify if there were any differences in how four of these party leaders, Lars Ohly, Maud Olofsson, Fredrik Reinfeldt and Mona Sahlin were treated in four individual questioning sessions on Swedish television. Utilizing conversation analysis the study focuses on identifying differences in the usage of interruptions between the four different sessions. The study also analyzes the aggressiveness of the journalists’ questioning and how they designed their questions in the four different sessions. Results show some significant differences in how the four different party leaders were treated in their individual questioning sessions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 58 p.
Keyword [en]
Conversation analysis, Interruption, Aggressive questioning, Question design, News interview, Politicians, Journalism, Differential treatment
National Category
Media and Communications
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-14157ISRN: ORU-HUS/MKV-GK-2011/0006--SEOAI: diva2:390685
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Available from: 2011-04-15 Created: 2011-01-23 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(273 kB)