Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of Synthetic MRI for Clinical Use
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a qualitative method for obtaining images of softtissues in patients. Conventional MRI is the standard method used today and it results in gray-scaleimages in which the different magnetic properties of biological tissues determine the image contrast. However, the magnitude of the measured signal is only relative and therefore not directlycomparable between images. Synthetic MRI is a relatively new technique which can be used to postsynthesizedifferent images based on absolute measurement of several magnetic properties oftissues. Synthetic MRI can therefore provide quantitative information together with the contrastimages.

In order to use synthetic MRI clinically an evaluation of the image quality and diagnostic ability isrequired. The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate if synthetic MRI and conventional MRI produceimages with equal contrast.

A study was designed and conducted for statistical evaluation of contrast and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio(CNR) generated with different imaging methods. A total of 22 patients were examined using bothconventional MRI and synthetic MRI and the results were pairwise analyzed.

The contrast and CNR could not be stated as equal for the imaging methods. Typically the contrastwas higher in the synthetic images for the T1 and T2 weighted images. This was not observed withCNR which suggests that the noise is higher in the synthetic images. The higher contrast obtained insynthetic images resulted in a better separation of different tissues using synthetic MRI. Thesynthetic T2 FLAIR images contained artifacts that are not good for clinical use. However the fact thatthe different imaging methods produce different image quality is not proven to be clinically decisive.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 71 p.
Keyword [en]
Synthetic MRI, MRI, Contrast, CNR, Statistics
National Category
Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-64359ISRN: LIU-IMH/RV-A--10/002--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-64359DiVA: diva2:389732
Subject / course
Radiological Sciences
Uppsok
Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-01-11 Created: 2011-01-20 Last updated: 2012-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3976 kB)1206 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3976 kBChecksum SHA-512
bd352cbf783a2de07d2aee627ea28e13019df899610b80f3caaf29265df7963ee227acad4b607c20c1b9e62d218ee8d31cd3ac01dfd07eaad58b9e18e10b1aae
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Medical and Health Sciences
Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1206 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 218 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf