Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Validity and user-friendliness of the minimal eating observation and nutrition form version II (MEONF II) for undernutrition risk screening
Central Hospital, Kristianstad.
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University. (Forskningsmiljön PRO-CARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2174-372X
Kristianstad University, School of Health and Society, Avdelningen för Hälsovetenskap. Kristianstad University, Research Environment PRO-CARE.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4820-6203
2011 (English)In: Food & Nutrition Research, ISSN 1654-6628, E-ISSN 1654-661X, no 55, 5801- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective To analyze the criterion-related validity and user-friendliness of the Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form – Version II (MEONF – II) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in relation to the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). In addition, the effect of substituting body mass index (BMI) with calf circumference (CC) was explored for the MEONF-II. Methods The study included 100 patients who were assessed for nutritional status with the MNA (full version), considered here to be the gold standard, and screened with the MUST and the MEONF-II. The MEONF-II includes assessments of involuntary weight loss, BMI (or calf circumference), eating difficulties, and presence of clinical signs of undernutrition. Results The MEONF-II sensitivity (0.73) and specificity (0.88) were acceptable. Sensitivity and specificity for the MUST were 0.57 and 0.93, respectively. Replacing the BMI with CC in the MEONF-II gave similar results (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.90). Assessors considered MEONF-II instructions and items to be relevant, easy to understand and complete (100%), and the questions to be relevant (98%). MEONF-II and MUST took 8.8 and 4.7 minutes to complete, respectively, and both were considered relevant and easy to finish. In addition, MEONF-II was thought to reveal problems that allows for nursing interventions. Conclusions The MEONF-II is an easy to use, relatively quick, and sensitive screening tool to assess risk of undernutrition among hospital inpatients, which allows for substituting BMI with CC in situations where measures of patient height and weight cannot be easily obtained. High sensitivity is of primary concern in nutritional screening and the MEONF-II outperforms the MUST in this regard.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. no 55, 5801- p.
Keyword [en]
undernutrition, screening, criterion-related validity, acceptability, MEOF, MNA, MUST, MEONF
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-7569DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.5801PubMedID: 21246022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-7569DiVA: diva2:386700
Available from: 2011-03-04 Created: 2011-01-13 Last updated: 2014-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(226 kB)291 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 226 kBChecksum SHA-512
f89283adb1d14ddf14952dc116140077bd7e71c9c281fd44efd119815e7b76c3c6e2841b486512a27d10e97bfc936b5d95191d6f3d9c5dbdfff42d187ef051a8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagell, PeterWestergren, Albert
By organisation
Avdelningen för HälsovetenskapResearch Environment PRO-CARE
In the same journal
Food & Nutrition Research
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 291 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 169 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link