Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Vad kommer på provet?: Gymnasielärares provpraxis i samhällskunskap
Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Centre for the Studies of Social Sciences Didactics. (Forskarskolan för lärare i historia och samhällskunskap)
2011 (Swedish)Licentiate thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
What is tested? : Civics teachers' assessment practice in upper secondary school (English)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study is to investigate the assessment practices of civics teachers in upper secondary school. The main purpose is to analyze, using Bloom’s revised taxonomy, which kind of knowledge civics teachers test in their written test examinations. The analyses show that they mainly test factual and conceptual knowledge. Procedural knowledge is tested in other ways, mostly by means of essays. Metacognitive knowledge is not found in this study. In contrast to earlier findings the teachers in this study test a variation of cognitive processes. Between 50 and 90 percent of test questions relate to the category remember, but there are also questions testing the categories to understand, analyze and evaluate, only a few test apply and create. There is a good alignment in teachers’ knowledge of the grading criterions and the curriculum. There are however discrepancies between this knowledge and their testing practices, which causes some problems concerning the validity of their tests.

As the tests mainly are used for summative purposes, teachers varying practices lead to problems with grade equality. Frame factors may explain differences in practices. Mainly administrative factors such as working hours and schedule are significant, since teachers need time to prepare and to mark the tests and pupils need time to write them. Pupils also wish to have written tests and teachers adapt to this. Still, the significance of these factors is decided by teachers’ freedom of action. Most teachers know how to and want to make valid tests, but they need the time, both to prepare and to mark them, and the possibilities to extend lessons when more writing time is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet , 2011. , 160 p.
Series
Studier i de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik, 5Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2011:2
Keyword [en]
assessment practices, tests, knowledge, upper secondary school, frame factors, Bloom's revised taxonomy
Keyword [sv]
bedömning, prov, kunskaper, gymnasielärare, provpraxis, Blooms reviderade taxonomi, ramfaktorer
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-6716ISBN: 978-91-7063-334-8OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-6716DiVA: diva2:380888
Presentation
2011-04-01, Gradängsalen, Vimmerby gymnasium, Vimmerby, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2011-03-09 Created: 2010-12-22 Last updated: 2011-10-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1372 kB)3382 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1372 kBChecksum SHA-512
88461f7935af3b7d2e6b0f5fd64ebd7aad9cd366f9ded9a472d75e6f655817ac1c3203ab9ca10e01fd7d5abf0916d043816f886483c3e71928dcda83ce228487
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jansson, Tobias
By organisation
Centre for the Studies of Social Sciences Didactics
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3382 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 2421 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link