Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Trovärdig krisinformation eller sensationsjournalistik?: Diskursanalys av myndigheternas och mediernas information kring pandemiklassificeringen av den nya influensan den 11 juni 2009
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose with this study is to analyze if the Swedish authorities and media had different ways of discussing the new influenza, in connection with the pandemic classification June 11, 2009. This is the first time an influenza has been classified as a pandemic since the Hongkong-influenza in1968. Methodology: The method used for the study is discourse analysis, aqualitative method that gives the opportunity to study not only what is said, but how things are said. In this thesis, the aim is to study how the image ofthe new influenza is transmitted via the texts. The texts have been analysed based on:- General and underlying themes- Words and concepts used- Persons/sources quoted or referred to- Historical connections/historical backgroundTheoretical perspectives: The study is based on theories about socialconstructionism and discourse analysis. Conclusions: the conclusions drawn from the study show that the media textsare more dramatic and sensational when it comes to describing the newinfluenza. The Swedish authorities have a more fact-based and calming tone towards the public. Within the analyzed material, it is possible to seedifferences between the discourses, also when describing the same themes. Within some themes, resemblances have been identified between the mediadiscourse and the authorithy discourse.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 66
Keywords [en]
discourse analysis, social constructionism, the new influenza, swine flu, reassurance-arousal paradox, rhetoric of fear
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-6588OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-6588DiVA, id: diva2:327316
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-07-11 Created: 2010-06-28 Last updated: 2010-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Trovärdig krisinformation eller sensationsjournalistik?(1406 kB)234 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1406 kBChecksum SHA-512
c6e2bc596239f5c75a210f964e60ab393f65020c8691b05383046ce8b02f3584f7461c3433a9498d663014ee029bcf6238019e69f2525ee2e5420e588b6642d1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Social Sciences
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 234 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 332 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf