Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Folkhemmets reklam: En jämförelse mellan reklamannonser då och nu
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The first ad was published in Sweden 1645. Advertising itself is not a new phenomenon, it's just the conditions that has been changed. Today, advertising is a matter of course in our daily lives, every day we are exposed to thousands of messages that wants to persuade and convince us to consume. In this paper, we have looked into the semiotic and rhetorical tricks that are used for this particular persuasion, and we have investigated whether they have changed in the last 60 years or if the same tricks are still being used today. Our two hypotheses is: A) the rhetorical and semiotic basis of an ad looks the same today as 60 years ago. Despite the obvious difference in layout and graphic design, we believe that persuasion techniques in the form of semiotic and rhetorical character used to sell a product does not differ significantly for the past compared to today. B) Propaganda is used more often in ads from the past then in the ads of today. The purpose of this paper has been to examine whether these hypothesis are correct or not. Our conclusion was based on a qualitative image- and rhetoric analysis applied to six ads from the past (40’s, 50’s and 60’s) and six ads from the present (2010) and the research of how propaganda is used. It was concluded that the hypothesis was not true, instead, we could see during the sixties that led to a different type of ad, a type that is more consistent with today's ads.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 63
Keywords [sv]
Reklam, retorik, semiotik, annonser, bildanalys
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-6308OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-6308DiVA, id: diva2:325246
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-07-11 Created: 2010-06-17 Last updated: 2010-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Folkhemmets reklam(894 kB)980 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 894 kBChecksum SHA-512
c25cec9b6e2a1caf9a63f9106a9d0ed556bf12e8a0f9d5a4f6c6834da59c93947eb4f5f562f3331c76cc4b5e4eb5c2996963c3b2905d59facd5f6f17650b2df5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friberg, HenrikSvarén, Malin
By organisation
School of Social Sciences
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 980 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1296 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf