Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ChatGPT in engineering education: a breakthrough or a challenge?
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Applied Physics and Electronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2960-3094
2025 (English)In: Physics Education, ISSN 0031-9120, E-ISSN 1361-6552, Vol. 60, no 4, article id 045006Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In engineering education, where hands-on problem-solving and technical proficiency especially in physics-based learning are critical, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT remains debated; whether AI serves as a breakthrough innovation or presents new challenges. This study seeks to bridge that gap by examining the impact of ChatGPT on mechanical engineering students in a project-based course. It explores how students used AI tools to understand key concepts, support group collaboration, and improve coding and writing tasks. Using survey data from first-year students encouraged to integrate AI into their coursework, the research provides insights into the ethical and educational implications of AI in engineering education, considering both its benefits and challenges. The findings indicate that while ChatGPT was widely utilized for coding tasks such as MATLAB programming and enhancing conceptual understanding, its impact on group collaboration was modest. Ethical concerns, including the temptation to misuse AI, highlight the need for structured guidelines to ensure responsible AI usage. The study also identifies the necessity of verifying AI-generated outputs, as AI tools may produce inaccurate or misleading information, particularly in technical problem-solving. This paper offers recommendations for optimizing AI-assisted learning, fostering critical thinking, and adapting assessment practices to balance AI's educational benefits with academic integrity. These insights aim to guide educators and policymakers in effectively integrating AI into engineering and physics education while addressing its challenges to create a productive learning environment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Physics (IOP), 2025. Vol. 60, no 4, article id 045006
Keywords [en]
ChatGPT, engineering education, generative AI, educational technology, higher education, academic integrity, pedagogy, Chatbots, Artificial intelligence
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238553DOI: 10.1088/1361-6552/add073OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238553DiVA, id: diva2:1957149
Available from: 2025-05-08 Created: 2025-05-08 Last updated: 2025-05-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(368 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 368 kBChecksum SHA-512
4b9441d3b12f509ab9026ec517e885ff5c6d39b3f141ea4242bf8d36196497997b84f6fbeee5063ae97b012293f30477350b5f2cc0cc6285de77d68c03285cf6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khodadad, Davood
By organisation
Department of Applied Physics and Electronics
In the same journal
Physics Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 177 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf