Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in South Africa: data from a newly established prospective regional register
Univ Cape Town, Dept Surg, Div Ophthalmol, Cape Town, South Africa..
Univ Cape Town, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa..
South African Med Res Council, Biostat Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa.;Univ Western Cape, Stat & Populat Studies Dept, Cape Town, South Africa..
Univ Cape Town, Dept Surg, Div Ophthalmol, Cape Town, South Africa..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BMJ Open Ophthalmology, E-ISSN 2397-3269, Vol. 10, no 1, article id e002036Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) registers enable population-based studies to monitor ROP screening programmes to improve their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of ROP and the coverage of screening in a South African cohort using a prospective ROP South African (ROPSA) register.

Methods and analysis Infants born from 1 May 2022 to 31 January 2023 and screened prospectively for ROP at five neonatal intensive care units in Cape Town were included. The screening criteria were a gestational age (GA) <32 weeks or birth weight (BW) <1250 g. Data were extracted from the ROPSA register and analysed.

Results 696 of 1154 (60.3%) eligible infants were screened, almost half of whom (45.7%) did not complete screening. ROP was detected in 220 infants (31.6%, 95% CI 28.3% to 35.3%), 7 (1.0%) of whom required treatment. Infants with incomplete screening had a lower mean GA than those who completed screening; 28.7 (SD 1.6, range 25–33) and 29.1 (SD 1.7, range 24–36) weeks, respectively (p=0.004) and a lower mean BW; 1048 (SD 203, range 650–1690) g and 1108.5 (SD 227, range 640–1840) g, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions Data from the ROPSA register on the frequency of any ROP and treatment-requiring ROP may be biased due to low screening coverage and high incomplete screening. Reasons need to be explored and corrective interventions initiated. The ROPSA register will enable the impact of these interventions to be monitored. The findings of this study will contribute to the ongoing revision of South African national ROP screening guidelines.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 10, no 1, article id e002036
Keywords [en]
Retina, Epidemiology, Child Health
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-555379DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002036ISI: 001463033600001PubMedID: 40194866Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002308826OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-555379DiVA, id: diva2:1954685
Funder
Eye FoundationAvailable from: 2025-04-25 Created: 2025-04-25 Last updated: 2025-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(679 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 679 kBChecksum SHA-512
c7ef43470c5f6a6c57d9f9f6e3cc3391fc164bd00e2919b7ae5fed29b2a49745002d089637eda52cf05b7c5f4e7155a27d5b677bb8f268fcb83f01b2de9a85c4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmström, Gerd
By organisation
Ophthalmic Biophysics
In the same journal
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf