Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International Cross-Sectional Survey on Management of Type II Endoleak and the Role of Preemptive Embolization
Umm Al Aura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Mecca, Saudi Arabia..
Univ Trieste, Dept Clin Surg & Hlth Sci, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Trieste, Italy..
Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Aarhus, Denmark..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4224-5351
2025 (English)In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, ISSN 0890-5096, E-ISSN 1615-5947, Vol. 115, p. 53-59Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Type II endoleaks (TIIELs) commonly occur following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). There is a lack of unified consensus regarding the management of TIIEL. Preemptive embolization is a potential method to reduce the risk for TIIEL, but its role is debated. We performed a survey among aortic experts internationally to assess perspectives on TIIEL management and the role of preemptive embolization.

Methods: A questionnaire was prepared covering aspects on effect of TIIEL on EVAR outcome, strategies to manage TIIEL, and attitudes toward preemptive embolization techniques. The questionnaire was distributed using an online platform among vascular specialists across 80 specialized aortic centers worldwide.

Results: Of 80 survey recipients, 56 (70%) responded. Only 12% of participants did not believe TIIEL to affect the durability of EVAR. Nearly 82.2% of respondents believed TIIEL increases the likelihood of reintervention. One-quarter agreed that TIIEL increases aortic-related mortality post-EVAR. For established TIIEL, 12% find "any sac expansion"to be an indication for intervention, while 41% would intervene at >5 mm sac expansion, and 52% at >10 mm sac expansion. Majority (63%) perform selective embolization in this setting. Only 3.6% of participants reported routinely conducting preemptive embolization in over 30% of their EVAR cases, while 42.9% never performed this procedure, and 53.6% performed preemptive embolization in <30% of cases. A substantial 76.8% believed that existing literature lacked sufficient evidence to support the integration of preemptive embolization into their clinical practice. Additionally, almost 90% expressed interest in participating in a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preemptive embolization.

Conclusion: Management of TIIEL is highly diverse among aortic experts. There is a need for further evidence on when and how to best treat TIIEL, as well as robust studies with long-term data to assess the potential role of preemptive embolization in increasing the durability of EVAR.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 115, p. 53-59
National Category
Surgery Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-554885DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.027ISI: 001459870500001PubMedID: 40064285Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000962795OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-554885DiVA, id: diva2:1954499
Available from: 2025-04-25 Created: 2025-04-25 Last updated: 2025-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(431 kB)25 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 431 kBChecksum SHA-512
f6d78823d6e8f141314cfbdfaff70a80d534f38b764077b5104cef8593b124878384e02e9ff5fe8b0ca52b0de29b23559131eeff5071223aaf9961b300d79226
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mani, Kevin
By organisation
Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
Annals of Vascular Surgery
SurgeryCardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 25 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf