Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"The safest woman alive": a reflection on interpersonal safety technologies for gendered violence protection
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics.
Northumbria University, UK.
2025 (English)In: CHI '25 Content, 2025Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

We tell a story of a woman getting ready to go for a walk, using a plethora of personal safety technologies designed and reported on by HCI researchers to ensure her own safety against public gendered violence (GV). To reflect on this approach, we elicit the Four Domains of Power, highlighting HCI’s over-engagement with interpersonal safety technologies when seeking to intervene in GV.In later parts of the paper, we discuss two main contributions for HCI: (1) The Complexities of Designing for GV as an Interpersonal Problem and (2) Complexities of Designing for Normative Understandings of GV to highlight the potential harm in employing interpersonal technological solutions to socio-political issues. Coming back to the four domains of power, we ultimately argue that HCI-researchers and designers can use the framework to analyse their technological interventions to address GV in more nuanced ways so as to not re-produce shortsighted, solutionist, or victim-blaming technologies. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-237741OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-237741DiVA, id: diva2:1952738
Conference
CHI 2025, Yokohama, Japan, April 26 - May 1, 2025
Available from: 2025-04-16 Created: 2025-04-16 Last updated: 2025-04-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Systemic sensitivity: on systemic oppression in socio-techical systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Systemic sensitivity: on systemic oppression in socio-techical systems
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Systemisk känslighet : systemiskt förtryck i socio-tekniska system
Abstract [en]

As technology becomes an integral part of everyday life for many, it also becomes a tool to facilitate harm and injustice towards communities who face marginalization.

To understand and address challenges of systemic oppression, the field of human–computer interaction (HCI) has moved towards framing larger questions of injustice and systemic issues. Through the growing area of social justice in HCI, researchers are collectively working to frame more just futures for communities that have experienced marginalization. 

However, the influence of systemic oppression on socio-technical systems can create hard-to-predict outcomes that ultimately lead to reproducing harmful practices towards marginalized communities. 

Through the included papers in this dissertation, on a range of topics from cultural heritage for Sámi communities, ageism reproduced through technology implementation, socio-political awareness to mitigate technology-facilitated sex trafficking, supporting women with experience of sexual violence to paths of justice, building a cohesive and fluid understanding of social justice in HCI, and critiquing interpersonal safety technologies, I present and discuss how the influence of systemic oppression creates hard-to-predict outcomes in the socio-technical systems we create. I show how these outcomes can lead to reproducing harmful practices towards marginalized communities and why it is important to actively work against this. 

To address the outcomes and harmful practices that I refer to as the “harm-reproduction loop,” I propose a theoretical lens called systemic sensitivity. Systemic sensitivity is a lens to support researchers in understanding the loop, addressing hard-to-predict outcomes and mitigating harmful practices. In doing so, we can more actively work against systemic oppression and work towards socio-political change and long-term contributions towards marginalized communities. 

This dissertation is a compilation dissertation, which means it is based on six papers in total. These papers are the foundation of the work produced, and all have been conducted within social justice in HCI.

Abstract [sv]

Allteftersom teknologi blir en större del av människors liv kan det även bli ett allt större verktyg för systemiskt förtryck av marginaliserade grupper. 

För att förstå och adressera detta har området Människa-datorinteraktion (HCI) börjat centrera frågor om orättvisa och systemiska utmaningar. Genom det växande området ”Social Justice” inom HCI, arbetar forskare tillsammans med grupper och individer som upplevt marginalisering för att främja en rättvisare framtid. 

Men inflytandet som systemiskt förtryck har på socio-tekniska system kan skapa oförutsägbara resultat som i slutändan leder till att skadliga praktiker reproduceras gentemot marginaliserade grupper. Utan att vara känslig inför dessa resultat och skadliga praktiker kan forskare, trots motsatt avsikt, bidra till systemiskt förtryck. 

Genom artiklarna som ingår i denna avhandling presenterar och diskuterar jag hur inflytandet av systemiskt förtryck skapar svårförutsägbara utfall inom de sociotekniska system vi skapar. Jag visar hur dessa resultat kan leda till att reproducera skadliga metoder gentemot marginaliserade grupper och varför det är viktigt att aktivt motarbeta detta.

Grunden till avhandlingens bidrag kommer från 6 artiklar som handlar om allt från tillgång till kulturellt arv för samiska grupper, ålderism som reproduceras via teknologisk implementering, vikten av socio-politisk medvetenhet för att minska teknologiskt-faciliterad sextrafficking, digitalt stöd för kvinnor som upplevt sexuella övergrepp, hur man främjar en sammanhållen förståelse för Social Justice inom HCI, till att kritisera personlig säkerhetsteknologi. 

Avhandlingens bidrag stöttar HCI forskare att förstå och adressera systemiskt förtryck samt främjar positiv socio-politisk förändring gentemot marginaliserade grupper på lång sikt. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2025. p. 81
Series
Research reports in informatics, ISSN 1401-4572
Keywords
Human-Computer Interaction, Socio-Technical Systems, Social Justice, Systemic Oppression, Justice
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-237745 (URN)978-91-8070-678-0 (ISBN)978-91-8070-679-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-05-23, MIT.A.121, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-04-23 Created: 2025-04-16 Last updated: 2025-04-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(493 kB)16 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 493 kBChecksum SHA-512
0be276640e45d9aa0ae57b1178623429fa552040694a7cf9230bf23a2c83d5e7610d478cc252c633009599f45727da93f24a6117a3f0c70185a4e462fbf74718
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Abstract

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öhlund, Linnea
By organisation
Department of Informatics
Human Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 16 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf