Incidence of constrained condylar and hinged knee implants and mid- to long-term survivorship: a register- based study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA)Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Acta Orthopaedica, ISSN 1745-3674, E-ISSN 1745-3682, Vol. 96, p. 142-150
Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background and purpose In complex primary to knee arthroplasty (TKA), constrained condylar knee (CCK) or rotating hinge knee (RHK) designs may be required to provide stability or address bony deficiencies. We analyzed trends incidence of these designs in primary TKA and evaluated the mid- to long-term survivorship of CCK and RHK in 4 Nordic countries.
Methods From 2000 to 2017, 5,134 CCK and 2.515 RHK primary TKAs were identified from the NARA data-base. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival and flexible parametric survival model (FPSM) analyses were performed to estimate revision risk, expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% con-fidence intervals (CI), with minimally stabilized (MS) TKA acting as the control group (n = 456,137).
Results The incidence of CCK and RHK implants increased significantly in Finland, while it was moderate in Denmark. Norway, and Sweden. With revision for any reason as the endpoint the 15-year K-M cumulative revision risk for RHK was 13.6% (CI 10.4-16.7) and for CCK it was 11.3% (CI 9.113.5). Compared with MS TKA, the hazard ratio for revision was 2.1 (CI 1.8-2.3) for CCK and 25 (CI 2.1-2.8) for RHK. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was the most common reason for revision, accounting for 44% of CCK and 47% of RHK cases. After excluding revisions for PJI, the hazard ratio remained high for both designs at 15 (CI 13-17) for CCK and 1.6 (CI 1.3-2.0) for RHK compared with MS.
Conclusion
The incidence of CCK and RHK increased during the study period. Both designs showed consistent 15-year revision risks of 11-14%, with no major differences between them. The higher revision risk compared with MS TKAs may reflect the complexity of the surgeries.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MJS Publishing, 2025. Vol. 96, p. 142-150
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-554533DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2025.42999ISI: 001450876300001PubMedID: 39912759Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85218118924OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-554533DiVA, id: diva2:1952139
2025-04-142025-04-142025-04-14Bibliographically approved