Security is a crucial factor for social stability, but balancing effective crime prevention with democratic values ​​is a challenge. In response to rising gang-related violence, Sweden introduced security zones, which are areas where the police were given enhanced powers to prevent crime for a two-week period. Although similar strategies exist internationally, limited research has explored the effects and consequences of the Swedish security zones. This study addresses this gap by examining the zones' initial objectives and consequences, focusing on their impact on police-community relations and compliance with democratic policing principles.

This study used an abductive research approach. Through semi-structured interviews with police officers working in security zones and residents living in the affected areas, the study applied securitization theory, community policing, and democratic policing as analytical frameworks. The research aimed to assess whether the security zones achieved their intended goal of increasing security or whether they contributed to unintended consequences. The results showed that the police officers viewed security zones as a necessary tool for crime prevention. However, residents expressed mixed reactions. While the majority appreciated the increased police presence, others felt disproportionately targeted. The results suggest that a more balanced approach, integrating increased police presence with stronger community policing efforts, could mitigate negative consequences while maintaining security.