Factorial Mendelian randomization of lipoprotein (a) lowering, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering, and lifestyle improvements: joint associations with cardiovascular riskShow others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: International Journal of Epidemiology, ISSN 0300-5771, E-ISSN 1464-3685, Vol. 54, no 2, article id dyaf020Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background
High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the effects of Lp(a)-lowering therapy in combination with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering treatment or lifestyle improvements on CVD risk remain unexplored.
Methods
We conducted a factorial Mendelian randomization study among 385 917 participants in the UK Biobank. Separate genetic scores were constructed to proxy the effects of Lp(a) lowering, LDL-C lowering through different targets [HMG-CoA reductase, NPC1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin Type 9, and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)], as well as improvements in body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and lifestyle factors (cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity).
Results
Genetically predicted lower Lp(a) levels were associated with a decreased risk of CVD and CVD-specific mortality. Per 50-mg/dl, the hazard ratio ranged from 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73, 0.73] for peripheral artery disease (PAD) to 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.99) for venous thromboembolism. In factorial analyses exploring combined exposure to low-level Lp(a) and low-level LDL-C, there was no consistent evidence for departure from an additive model for any outcome (Pinteraction > .05), with the exception of the analysis using the LDLR score and PAD (Pinteraction = .006). In factorial analyses exploring combination therapies integrating Lp(a) lowering with interventions on BMI, SBP, and lifestyle factors, there was no evidence for departure from an additive model in any analysis (Pinteraction > .05).
Conclusions
Our study suggests that Lp(a) lowering will have a similar magnitude for reducing cardiovascular events whether it is considered alone, or in conjunction with LDL-C reduction or lifestyle improvements.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025. Vol. 54, no 2, article id dyaf020
Keywords [en]
cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality, lipoprotein(a), lifestyle factor, factorial Mendelian randomization
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-553355DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaf020ISI: 001440642400001PubMedID: 40064167OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-553355DiVA, id: diva2:1948268
2025-03-282025-03-282025-03-28Bibliographically approved