Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Antimicrobial resistance and the non-accountability effect on consumers' behaviour
Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Campus Gotland, Uppsala, Sweden..
Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Uppsala, Sweden..
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Movement, Culture and Society. Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8995-3038
Umeå Univ, Umeå Sch Business Econ & Stat, Umeå, Sweden.;Umea Univ, Ctr Reg Sci CERUM, Umea, Sweden..
2025 (English)In: Social Responsibility Journal, ISSN 1747-1117, E-ISSN 1758-857X, Vol. 21, no 5, p. 1125-1143Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose A status quo situation has occurred among actors, policymakers, producers, retailers and consumers where no one takes the lead on the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) fight. Common theoretical approaches to behaviour including awareness, understanding and use are insufficient in the AMR context. In this paper, the authors suggest the application of accountability literature to fully understand the status quo situation with AMR.

Design/methodology/approach AMR in food has become an alarming problem in the past decade and is an increasing threat to global health. The knowledge about AMR often comes from a medical context where the perspective is completely different. Therefore, it is difficult for consumers to apply this to a grocery store context purchasing food.

Findings This paper uses the concept of accountability and the significant other within the accountability field and discusses how this could help overcome the non-action state of mind of consumers and other actors.

Practical implications Enhanced accountability could significantly improve One-Health solutions for combating AMR. By fostering a culture of shared responsibility and transparent communication among stakeholders, the silo effect may be mitigated, promoting collaborative efforts. Accountability mechanisms should ensure that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated across sectors, such as health care, agriculture and policymaking. Educational initiatives can increase AMR awareness, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions. Integrating perspectives from various domains will facilitate the development of holistic strategies, thus improving the overall effectiveness of efforts to address AMR and ensuring a sustainable approach to public health.

Social implications Enhanced accountability in AMR management can lead to significant social benefits. By promoting transparency and collective responsibility, communities can foster greater trust and cooperation among various stakeholders, including health-care providers, policymakers and consumers. Increased awareness of AMR can empower individuals to make informed decisions, thereby promoting public health and safety. Socially, this could lead to more sustainable practices in antibiotic use and a reduction in the spread of resistant infections. In addition, fostering a culture of accountability ensures that efforts to combat AMR are more inclusive, equitable and effective, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.

Originality/value The proposal to create strategies according to a basis of accountability can be applied at all levels of the AMR problem and for all actors. This therefore provides important knowledge about how AMR can be approached in a more long-term way where initiatives to prevent the spread of AMR do not take place in parallel or become difficult to access.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2025. Vol. 21, no 5, p. 1125-1143
Keywords [en]
Antimicrobial resistance, Behaviour change, Sustainable consumer behaviour, Sustainable health, Accountability
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-8630DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-12-2023-0721ISI: 001438656200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000483155OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-8630DiVA, id: diva2:1947913
Note

This article ispublished under the CreativeCommons Attribution (CC BY4.0) licence.

Available from: 2025-03-27 Created: 2025-03-27 Last updated: 2025-03-27

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(210 kB)37 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 210 kBChecksum SHA-512
a2ac04a322819fdcdae4c8d72d9f7278f79480cbb3d0d44f5fae6596cc16a78f302a1afc801889bb8e95ab831e162e9b79ddb1ce6385deab5f4f9558aed00b68
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Oljans, Emma
By organisation
Department of Movement, Culture and Society
In the same journal
Social Responsibility Journal
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 38 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf