Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of software-optimized protocols for acoustic noise reduction during brain MRI at 7 Tesla
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7480-770x
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ISSN 1053-1807, E-ISSN 1522-2586Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Background: MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2W FSE) and three-dimensional T1-weighted turbo field echo (3D T1W TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.

Study Type: Prospective.

Subjects: Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.

Field Strength/Sequence: Conventional and SofTone versions of T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE at 7 T.

Assessment: Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.

Statistical Test: Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on T2W FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D T1W TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. T2W FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21–1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D T1W TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81). Data Conclusion: SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment. Evidence Level: 4. Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025.
Keywords [en]
hearing protection, MR safety, software optimization, ultra-high field MRI
National Category
Radiology and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-236679DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29749ISI: 001438753700001PubMedID: 40048635Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000345996OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-236679DiVA, id: diva2:1947248
Funder
Region Skåne, RegSkane-2022-1171Swedish Research Council, VR-RFI 829-2010-5928Available from: 2025-03-25 Created: 2025-03-25 Last updated: 2025-03-25

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(419 kB)32 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 419 kBChecksum SHA-512
71502bca6ed7fa813ab3363b79f1b5feb205ff41fcc254ac817f0b632b15c12ac389cd7994709a58c00492acf5da79316ae5a0ad144f75a59cc167a9abddeeda
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glans, AntonWilén, JonnaLindgren, Lenita
By organisation
Department of NursingDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention
In the same journal
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiology and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 32 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 386 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf