Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impacts of fire on canopy structure and its resilience depend on successional stage in Amazonian secondary forests
Department of Geography, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, United Kingdom; Departament of Forest Sciences, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Department of Geography, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, United Kingdom; Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Departament of Forest Sciences, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil; Bioflore, Piracicaba, Brazil; Universidade do Carbono – BrCarbon, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8123-1817
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, E-ISSN 2056-3485Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Secondary forests in the Amazon are important carbon sinks, biodiversity reservoirs, and connections between forest fragments. However, their regrowth is highly threatened by fire. Using airborne laser scanning (ALS), surveyed between 2016 and 2018, we analyzed canopy metrics in burned (fires occurred between 2001 and 2018) and unburned secondary forests across different successional stages and their ability to recover after fire. We assessed maximum and mean canopy height, openness at 5 and 10 m, canopy roughness, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area height volume (LAHV) for 20 sites across South-East Amazonia (ranging from 375 to 1200 ha). Compared to unburned forests, burned forests had reductions in canopy height, LAI, and LAHV, and increases in openness and roughness. These effects were more pronounced in early successional (ES) than later successional (LS) stages, for example, mean canopy height decreased 33% in ES and 14% in LS and LAI decreased 36% in ES and 18% in LS. Forests in ES stages were less resistant to fire, but more resilient (capable of recovering from a disturbance) in their post-fire regrowth than LS stage forests. Data extrapolation from our models suggests that canopy structure partially recovers with time since fire for six out of seven canopy metrics; however, LAI and LAHV in LS forests may never fully recover. Our results indicate that successional stage-specific management and policies that mitigate against fire in early secondary forests should be implemented to increase the success of forest regeneration. Mitigation of fires is critical if secondary forests are to continue to provide their wide array of ecological services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025.
Keywords [en]
airborne laser scanning, Amazon, recovery, resilience, secondary forests, wildfires
National Category
Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-236468DOI: 10.1002/rse2.431ISI: 001421423200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85219697209OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-236468DiVA, id: diva2:1945815
Available from: 2025-03-19 Created: 2025-03-19 Last updated: 2025-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6059 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6059 kBChecksum SHA-512
f51f378dccda5d35f8c4c6d37e122e12492156a6c2e4bdcd4dd57ad28386426b95535fe0a3e0b8a688352ce08dde69c7120f712520adb1136f3df77f7ccfdd98
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bartholomew, David
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 224 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf