RDF graphs and (Labeled) Property Graphs (PGs) have emerged as data models for representing graph databases. Given the differences between the two models, ensuring interoperability between them has become essential, to leverage the strengths of both models. Various approaches have been proposed to map PGs to RDF graphs. However, these approaches differ in terms of structure, representation, size of the generated RDF graph, and degree of configuration provided to the user, making direct comparisons challenging. While declarative methods prevailed to construct RDF graphs from other data formats, the mapping languages proposed for such transformations have not been considered so far for mapping PGs to RDF graphs. In this work, we provide a representation of PG-to-RDF approaches through templates described using RML, a mapping language to construct RDF graphs from heterogeneous data. We show that all considered PG-to-RDF approaches can be represented in RML and, by having a uniform representation of them, we can compare them showcasing their differences. Finally, we show that not only can RML be used to capture PG-to-RDF mappings, but it actually offers more expressive power than the considered PG-to-RDF approaches.