Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Healthcare costs in relation to increased use of preoperative renal tumour biopsies
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, research centers etc., Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland. Västmanland Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0009-0006-8775-9774
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 60, p. 66-72Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To analyse the budget impact of adopting routine renal tumour biopsy (RTB) prior to decision on surgical treatment for clinical T1 renal tumours in Sweden.

Material and methods: This study used data from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register including 4,109 T1N0M0 renal tumours surgically treated during the years 2018-2022. We modelled a gradual increase in the proportion of preoperative RTBs over a five-year period, from 15.6 % of surgically removed clinical T1N0M0 renal tumors up to 90 % preoperative RTBs by 2029. Average costs per patient were calculated primarily using the Swedish cost-per-patient database. The analyses were stratified by tumour diameter: ≤40 mm (cT1a) and 41-70 mm (cT1b). The proportion of patients with benign RTB, complication rate and false negative RTBs was estimated from register data and previous research. A healthcare perspective was used and accounted for costs related to biopsy, surgery, follow-up of benign RTBs, complications and re-biopsy in cases of inconclusive RTBs.

Results: For cT1a, increasing preoperative RTBs to 90% of the study population reduced the net annual costs by €691,620, whilst for cT1b, costs increased by €67,630. Overall, an increase in preoperative RTBs to 90% of all patients with cT1 renal tumours was projected to reduce spending by €623,990 annually.

Conclusions: The budget impact analysis of routine preoperative RTBs in suspected renal cell carcinoma indicates net healthcare cost savings in cT1a and potentially for all cT1 tumours.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MJS Publishing, 2025. Vol. 60, p. 66-72
Keywords [en]
Renal tumour biopsy, economic impact, budget impact, economic evaluation, small renal mass, percutaneous renal biopsy, renal cell carcinoma
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Surgery Urology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-552412DOI: 10.2340/sju.v60.43194ISI: 001462624700002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000241721OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-552412DiVA, id: diva2:1944526
Funder
Region Stockholm
Note

De två första författarna delar förstaförfattarskapet

Available from: 2025-03-14 Created: 2025-03-14 Last updated: 2025-04-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(554 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 554 kBChecksum SHA-512
0c9ddd325422c5646306f60ec96b6150c7432666945376c7dd69c7dfc2a0835c95572804abb4bb7bbd5344d3d9bab704bd73dfa504b6109a020575cdf5a2e296
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mazin Hashim, BassamKarlsson Rosenblad, AndreasLjungberg, BörjeLundgren, Per-OlofNystrand, CamillaGoude, Fanny
By organisation
Centre for Clinical Research, County of VästmanlandClinical diabetology and metabolismDepartment of Statistics
In the same journal
Scandinavian journal of urology
Cancer and OncologySurgeryUrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 17 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 94 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf