Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinician and researcher responses to the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed: Content analysis of international, cross-sectional, qualitative survey data
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. Stanford Univ, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Stanford Pain Relief Innovat Lab, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA..
Stanford Univ, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Div Pain Med, Palo Alto, CA USA..
Stanford Univ, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA USA..
Western Univ, Arthur Labatt Family Sch Nursing, London, ON, Canada..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Journal of Pain, ISSN 1526-5900, E-ISSN 1528-8447, Vol. 29, article id 105330Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Pain catastrophizing is understood as a negative cognitive and emotional response to pain. Researchers, clinicians, advocates, and patients have reported stigmatizing effects of the term on patients when used clinically and in the media. This report describes the results of an international, observational, cross-sectional study investigation of clinician and researcher (professionals) perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed or desired. Open-ended electronic surveys were distributed to researchers and clinicians by collaborators, stakeholders, and through social media. Professionals reported on their familiarity with the term, its meaning and impacts, and their use of the term with patients. 1397 surveys from professionals in 46 countries (48.5% from the U.S.) were received. The sample was almost two-thirds female (61.3%), with a mean age of 56.67 (SD=4.04) years, and comprised of 78.6% clinicians (63.6%, pain specialists; n=698) and 20.3% researchers. The majority were familiar with the term (82.2%; n=1148). Among the 1098 clinicians, 33.6% had used the term in communication with patients. A content analysis of professionals' responses to open-ended questions is presented. Coded responses were synthesized into five content categories or themes: (1) pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated response to pain; (2) pain catastrophizing is an unhelpful response to pain; (3) the term pain catastrophizing is stigmatizing; (4) the term pain catastrophizing is clinically useful; (5) patients' perception of the term varies. Results highlight the continual controversy surrounding the term pain catastrophizing and the need for additional research and education to incorporate patient-centered approaches into clinical and public communications. Perspective: We present a content analysis of international clinician and researcher perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing. This investigation provides the largest depiction to date of the controversy surrounding pain catastrophizing and may guide future efforts to decrease stigma in patients with chronic pain and improve patient- clinician communication.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 29, article id 105330
Keywords [en]
Chronic pain, Pain catastrophizing, Stigma, Patient-centered communication, Qualitative
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-552096DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105330ISI: 001427198700001PubMedID: 39921100Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217143498OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-552096DiVA, id: diva2:1943893
Available from: 2025-03-12 Created: 2025-03-12 Last updated: 2025-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(772 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 772 kBChecksum SHA-512
b31d41a700734c30709f51cc1f25881a32cebf37614a791481c551f3b5189c3823f851c7ad7f1ec3e6dfe787d16ea65c7a30718aaad98ff95fe3c499ff11f874
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Crombez, GeertMackey, Sean C.McCracken, LanceZiadni, Maisa S.
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Journal of Pain
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 304 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf