Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Negative effects of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: Psychometric evaluation of an insomnia-specific extension for the Negative Effect Questionnaire
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5538-2593
Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Sleep Medicine, ISSN 1389-9457, E-ISSN 1878-5506, Vol. 129, p. 200-211Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Negative effects of psychotherapy encompass unwanted events caused by the treatment. Evidence exists that cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) can lead to negative effects (e.g., exhaustion, reduced motivation). Psychometrically validated instruments are needed to enable systematic investigation of negative effects and their consequences. This study aimed to develop an insomnia-specific extension for the Negative Effect Questionnaire (NEQ) and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

Method: Based on a literature review, an item pool was developed as an extension to the NEQ. This item pool was iteratively refined. Both the NEQ and the developed item pool were administered to participants enrolled in a stepped-care model for insomnia that includes an internet-delivered CBT-I. The psychometric properties of the item pool were evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). Additionally, responses to open-ended questions were categorized and analyzed.

Results: Data from 210 participants were available. In the newly developed item pool, participants reported a mean of 4.7 negative effects (range: 0 to 22). CFA indicated a good fit (RSMEA=0.05; SRMR=0.07) of a model with five latent factors (somatic symptoms, cognitive symptoms, safety, emotional symptoms, daytime functioning). The correlation analyses between the model's latent factors and the NEQ subscales indicated adequate discriminant validity.

Discussion: The observed prevalence rates of insomnia-specific negative effects highlight the need to assess the negative effects of CBT-I with an insomnia-specific instrument. The CFA suggests that the 24-item NEQ-Insomnia is a valid instrument, suitable for standalone use or as an extension to the NEQ for assessing the negative effects of CBT-I.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 129, p. 200-211
Keywords [en]
Insomnia, negative effects, side effects, sleep restriction therapy, instrument
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111858DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.044Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85219671918OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-111858DiVA, id: diva2:1942407
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 2;2025-04-08 (u2);

Full text license: CC BY 4.0;

Funder: German Federal Joint Committee (grant 01NVF18030);

Available from: 2025-03-05 Created: 2025-03-05 Last updated: 2025-04-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(5206 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 5206 kBChecksum SHA-512
5507a4ad4f50fdb5dabf8e163ad4993a22f87d5d0e38882a1569f3527b825e49301acde6220d384e4868923d060e0423a745e064196c121bd14e336642d8894e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Simon, LauraRozental, Alexander
By organisation
Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Sleep Medicine
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 35 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 320 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf