Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Cell Biology.ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7558-8309
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Cell Biology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Cell Biology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Research group Markus Sjöblom/Olof Nylander.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1406-9389
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, ISSN 1758-8340, Vol. 17, p. 1-30Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient’s quality of life.

Objectives:

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Design:

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

Data sources and methods:

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

Results:

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39–28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89–39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20–53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99–11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2025. Vol. 17, p. 1-30
Keywords [en]
abdominal pain, chemotherapy agents, diarrhea, gastrointestinal side effects, GI toxicity, hepatocellular carcinoma, nausea, transarterial chemoembolization
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-551435DOI: 10.1177/17588359251316663ISI: 001415721800001PubMedID: 39926261Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217225121OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-551435DiVA, id: diva2:1939853
Part of project
Novel treatment strategies for intestinal injury: the combination of peptides and non-peptide drugs at the dynamic intestinal barrier. , Swedish Research Council
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, 23 2776 PjSwedish Research Council, 2020-02367Available from: 2025-02-24 Created: 2025-02-24 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6413 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6413 kBChecksum SHA-512
84e67f4c8b37b1d6aecf700d3611fd255d7988b04795670cf979c5f8c935e503783ad45916b021dc55281ed67e7b793cc161980e0860051c6ead007aadd4f67b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arendt, NathalieKopsida, MariaKhaled, JaafarSjöblom, MarkusHeindryckx, Femke
By organisation
Department of Medical Cell BiologyResearch group Markus Sjöblom/Olof Nylander
Cancer and OncologyGastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 56 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 350 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf