Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Large simple randomized controlled trials – from drugs to medical devices: lessons from recent experience
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, research centers etc., Uppsala Clinical Research Center (UCR).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7767-3073
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, research centers etc., Uppsala Clinical Research Center (UCR).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4413-9736
Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Clin Trial Serv Unit & Epidemiol Studies Unit CTSU, Oxford, England..
Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Clin Trial Serv Unit & Epidemiol Studies Unit CTSU, Oxford, England..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Trials, E-ISSN 1745-6215, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 24Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of modern evidence-based medicine. They are considered essential to establish definitive evidence of efficacy and safety for new drugs, and whenever possible they should also be the preferred method for investigating new high-risk medical devices. Well-designed studies robustly inform clinical practice guidelines and decision-making, but administrative obstacles have made it increasingly difficult to conduct informative RCTs. The obstacles are compounded for RCTs of high-risk medical devices by extra costs related to the interventional procedure that is needed to implant the device, challenges with willingness to randomize patients throughout a trial, and difficulties in ensuring proper blinding even with sham procedures. One strategy that may help is to promote the wider use of simpler and more streamlined RCTs using data that are collected routinely during healthcare delivery. Recent large simple RCTs have successfully compared the performance of drugs and of high-risk medical devices, against alternative treatments; they enrolled many patients in a short time, limited costs, and improved efficiency, while also achieving major impact. From a task conducted within the CORE-MD project, we report from our combined experience of designing and conducting large pharmaceutical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of planning and coordinating large registry-based RCTs of cardiovascular devices. We summarize the essential principles and utility of large simple RCTs, likely applicable to all interventions but especially in order to promote their wider adoption to evaluate new medical devices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 24
Keywords [en]
Randomized controlled trials, Large simple trials, Medical devices
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-550031DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08724-xISI: 001400473000001PubMedID: 39833917Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85216439235OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-550031DiVA, id: diva2:1936713
Funder
Uppsala UniversityEU, Horizon 2020, 965246
Note

Correction in: Trials volume 26, Article number: 80 (2025)

DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08783-0

Available from: 2025-02-11 Created: 2025-02-11 Last updated: 2025-03-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1162 kB)27 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1162 kBChecksum SHA-512
f7ae05688bb11c64c509deff7052680a4ff180cf856b619c27a58bd40a9438760cd2927a4cae4ae264a7a643a330887b0cb7fedfbcc9fcc4b7d3119298736310
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Buccheri, SergioJames, StefanOldgren, Jonas
By organisation
CardiologyUppsala Clinical Research Center (UCR)
In the same journal
Trials
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 27 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 264 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf