Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation
Gothenburg Research Institute, Gothenburg School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2589-7964
Gothenburg Research Institute, Gothenburg School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6374-9471
School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Journal of nanoparticle research, ISSN 1388-0764, E-ISSN 1572-896X, Vol. 21, no 3, article id 57Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study is positioned in a multidisciplinary research field addressing questions of innovation, foresight, risk perception, regulation, and the role of stakeholder experts as regards nanomaterials and nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is an innovative scientific field with many potential societal benefits but also high uncertainty about risks to human health and the environment. This study is based on a survey distributed to a sample of 237 expert stakeholders in Sweden working in the field of nanotechnology innovation and regulation. The sample comprises experts in both industry and government organizations. The paper explores the expert’s assessment of benefits, risks, and their views of nanotechnology regulation. The experts generally agreed on the need for further regulation of nanotechnology, although they differed in their support for different regulatory measures. Support for government regulation was increased by greater perceived risk and by ethical concerns, while perceived benefit decreased support for government regulation. If nanotechnology was important for the respondent’s organization of affiliation, support for government regulation decreased. Experts in government organizations were more in favor of stronger government regulation, perceived higher risks, and were more concerned about the ethical implications of nanotechnology than were the industry experts. While previous research has discussed views of experts, as well as comparing the attitudes of the general public with experts, this study contributes to the field by analyzing and identifying differences between industry experts and experts working in government.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2019. Vol. 21, no 3, article id 57
Keywords [en]
Nanotechnology; Experts; Stakeholders; Risk perception; Risk psychology; Regulations
National Category
Medical Ethics Peace and Conflict Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified Public Administration Studies Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24893DOI: 10.1007/s11051-019-4498-1ISI: 000461307900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85063033551OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24893DiVA, id: diva2:1936482
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental ResearchSwedish Research Council
Note

CC BY 4.0

This research has been founded by The Swedish foundation for strategic environmental research (MISTRA) and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.

Available from: 2025-02-11 Created: 2025-02-11 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(441 kB)1956 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 441 kBChecksum SHA-512
e16caad10083f3ab17cc1fa7478953644c43c079828aea1eeac15b68668049bd10e068e6432cf54e78941f1f65dc90e3b216a050e0dd74439334352f8d3a935b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, SimonJansson, Magnus
In the same journal
Journal of nanoparticle research
Medical EthicsPeace and Conflict StudiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specifiedPublic Administration StudiesSociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1956 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2079 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf