BACKGROUND: The pectoralis major flap, which is usually harvested bilaterally, is considered a workhorse flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects. After a median sternotomy for open heart surgery, 1%-3% of patients develop deep infection and dehiscence of the sternal wound, some of which will eventually require reconstructive surgery. Our aim was to describe the clinical feasibility and associated complications of the unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients who were operated on using a unilateral pectoralis major flap for reconstruction of the chest wall at the Linköping University Hospital during 2008-18 was made using data retrieved from medical records.

RESULTS: Forty-three patients had reconstructions with unilateral pectoralis major flaps. Three flaps failed completely, and another 10 patients developed complications that required further operation. The factors that were independently associated with loss of the flaps and complications were: older age, male sex, the number of different antibiotics used, and a long duration of treatment with negative wound pressure. Fewer wound revisions before the reconstruction resulted in more complications. The factors that were independently associated with prolonged time to complete healing were emergency reoperation after the initial operation and complications after reconstruction.

CONCLUSION: The unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap has proved to be a useful technique in the reconstruction of most sternal defects after sternal wound infection in older patients. There is, however, need for a follow-up study on a larger number of procedures to evaluate the long-term outcome compared with other methods of sternal reconstruction.

Background: Pressure ulcers are troublesome for patients and require considerable resources to resolve. Previous studies have focused on recurrence, whereas there are few studies on flap survival. The aim was to describe the group and to analyze possible factors for flap survival.

Method: A descriptive retrospective analysis of all operations between 2008 and 2020 was carried out. Flap survival at 40 days was assessed. A flap was classified as a failure if a reoperation with removal or replacement was planned before, or in connection with, the first return visit. Variables of patient demographics, details of the pressure ulcers, and surgical treatment and care were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression for their effect on flap survival.

Results: A total of 111 flaps were included [78 (70%) with random blood supply and 33 (30%) with axial or perforator-based blood supply]; 54 (49%) of the flaps were fasciocutaneous. Body mass index was 25 (IQR 22–28). Flap survival rate was 90%. Variables associated with flap failure were higher body mass index, congenital spinal cord injury, type of blood supply to the flap, and the use of methylene blue to guide debridement of the wound.

Conclusions: The findings show factors that can be modified to improve future results, including a normalized body mass index and use of methylene blue in surgery to outline wound edges and depth, as this has been shown to protect against flap failure. Our data suggest that random flaps, such as V-Y, are preferable to axial flaps in the studied group.

Background The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is a commonly used method for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In this study, we present a long-term follow-up and effects of refining surgery on patient satisfaction and quality of life after breast reconstruction with the extended LD flap, using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the patient-reported long-term results after breast reconstruction with the extended LD myocutaneous flap.

Methods A retrospective cohort study of adult patients (n = 101) who were operated on using the extended LD flap for breast reconstruction at the Linköping University Hospital during 1997 to 2012 was made using data retrieved from medical records. The patients were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire at 2 different postoperative time points.

Results Eighty-three patients replied to the first questionnaire, and 56 patients also replied to the second. Mean follow-up was 11.7 years. Higher age and living together with someone correlated to higher BREAST-Q results, while postoperative infection, bilateral LD flaps, smoking, and prior breast surgery had a negative impact on the results. Overall BREAST-Q results increased over time. No independent effect of refining surgery could be shown.

Conclusions Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction with the LD flap as measured with the BREAST-Q questionnaire is high and in line with other studies. The overall satisfaction with the reconstruction method seems to increase with time, but no further increase in satisfaction after refining surgery could be established. Level of Evidence: 3