Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors influencing pregnant women’s decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis – a qualitative study
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Reproductive biology.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3702-8533
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, research centers etc., Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2989-4303
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1915-2453
2024 (English)In: Journal of Community Genetics, ISSN 1868-310X, E-ISSN 1868-6001, Vol. 15, no 6, p. 711-721Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and Objective: Prenatal diagnosis for chromosomal anomalies is frequently used worldwide. It is important that pregnant women receive adequate counselling to make informed decisions regarding prenatal diagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore what factors influence pregnant women’s decision-making process when accepting or declining prenatal screening and diagnosis.  Methods: A qualitative study using inductive qualitative content analysis. Individual, semi-structured phone interviews were carried out during a five-month period in 2016–2017 with 24 pregnant women in the first trimester, living in a medium-sized Swedish city. Findings: Two main themes emerged: (1)“Individual factors - The women’s experiences, perceptions and values” with three categories “Attitude towards anomalies”, “Worry and need for reassurance”, “Self-perceived risk” and (2)“External factors - The women’s perception of the test and others’ views” with two categories “Test characteristics” and “Influence from others”.  Conclusions: Pregnant women’s decision-making process regarding prenatal tests is multidimensional, affected by both individual factors such as experiences, perceptions and values, and external factors such as test characteristics and influence from others. Information about both test characteristics and the conditions tested is of help pregnant women in the decision-making process since it provides a better understanding of how having a child with the condition in question can affect them and their family. It is important that healthcare professionals giving information about and offering prenatal tests for chromosomal anomalies are aware of how their attitudes can influence women’s decisions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2024. Vol. 15, no 6, p. 711-721
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-549556DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00746-3ISI: 001345894400001PubMedID: 39485622Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85208038167OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-549556DiVA, id: diva2:1934925
Funder
Uppsala UniversityAvailable from: 2025-02-05 Created: 2025-02-05 Last updated: 2025-04-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1037 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1037 kBChecksum SHA-512
9fe057cae57c2115e8cce7fc68d9ed9d2ac30cced9aa854c35d82cbc2277cbdf9cd22bec63b7d91d9a36356be2bf6aa4b67ddd4dc740f97ab3909cc8a2e9b201
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ternby, EllenAxelsson, OveIngvoldstad, Charlotta MalmgrenGeorgsson, Susanne
By organisation
Reproductive biologyCentre for Clinical Research SörmlandObstetrics and Reproductive Health ResearchCentre for Research Ethics and Bioethics
In the same journal
Journal of Community Genetics
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf