Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ethics in EdTech: Consolidating Standards For Responsible Data Handling And Usercentric Design
Centre for Data, Culture & Society, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3165-6750
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Media and Information Technology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1253-9671
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Lancaster University, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8597-520X
Institute of Social Studies, University of Tartu, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4370-780X
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This report proposes aspirational principles for EdTech providers, emphasizing ethical practices, robust data protection, ownership rights, transparent consent processes, and active user engagement, particularly with children. These measures aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and trust in EdTech platforms.

Focusing on the K12 sector, the report systematically reviews and integrates key academic, legal, and technical frameworks to propose ethical benchmarks for the EdTech industry. The benchmarks go beyond quality assurance, highlighting good practices and ethical leadership for the field. The report addresses the need for a new culture in EdTech ethics, one that is collaborative and views EdTech providers as partners in dialogue with researchers and policy-makers to identify constructive solutions and uphold social trust.

The outlined benchmarks are intended for national policymakers, international agencies, and certification bodies to consider when developing quality standards for EdTech used in schools. They include AI safeguards and stress the importance of meeting international data protection standards, establishing clear ownership rights, and implementing transparent consent processes to address data control issues, as well as active user engagement for improving data governance practices. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stavanger: University of Stavanger , 2024. , p. 46
National Category
Ethics Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-206561DOI: 10.31265/usps.283ISBN: 978-82-8439-267-7 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-206561DiVA, id: diva2:1890614
Available from: 2024-08-20 Created: 2024-08-20 Last updated: 2025-02-21

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2638 kB)272 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2638 kBChecksum SHA-512
c86b08a987088a8350acc507b4fcb4b18761760981bf8f65ed5482bac613950cb7ebe3afaa7c4d7a36fdb51e1c4470a9e6845fa8d7aaa59ba38975a82d90a0ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Atabey, AyçaRobinson, CoryCermakova, Anna LindroosSiibak, AndraKucirkova, Natalia Ingebretsen
By organisation
Media and Information TechnologyFaculty of Science & Engineering
EthicsPublic Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 274 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 577 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf