Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Food safety in informal public markets in Kenya: perceptions of stakeholders in the food chain
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Biosci, Uppsala, Sweden.;Int Livestock Res Inst, One Hlth Res Educ & Outreach Ctr Africa, Nairobi, Kenya..
Int Livestock Res Inst, One Hlth Res Educ & Outreach Ctr Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.;Univ Greenwich, Natl Resources Inst, Fac Engn & Sci, London, England..
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Biosci, Uppsala, Sweden.;Swedish Vet Agcy, Uppsala, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology. Int Livestock Res Inst, One Hlth Res Educ & Outreach Ctr Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.;Swedish Vet Agcy, Uppsala, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1175-0398
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, E-ISSN 2571-581X, Vol. 8, article id 1411318Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction Informal markets play a crucial role in providing fresh and nutritious foods for people in low and middle-income countries. However, the safety of food sold in these markets remains a major concern, contributing to a high burden of foodborne illnesses.

Methods This study was designed to analyze stakeholder perceptions of food safety in selected informal public markets in Kenya. Eight focus group discussions and 15 key informant interviews were conducted. In addition, two workshops were held to validate the findings.

Results and discussion We found that consumers and vendors confounded food quality, especially freshness, with safety, and paid more attention to appearance and physical qualities than food safety. Information (such as branding and expiry dates) and heuristic cues (such as the flow of buyers and the presence of flies) were used to assess food safety. Meat was perceived as the food most likely to cause disease. Chemical hazards in fresh produce and aflatoxins in maize were mentioned as priority hazards by both vendors and consumers. Stakeholders more knowledgeable about food safety considered microbial hazards as a top priority. Although diarrheal diseases were reported to be prevalent in the communities, these were often thought to be the result of agri-chemical residues in fresh produce or the consumption of high-fat foods, and not commonly linked to bacteria in food. Gaps identified during the interviews included poor infrastructure, inadequate food safety knowledge, insufficient or prohibitive policies, insufficient political will, and poor food safety-related practices. There were few mentions of lack of motivation or incentives for behavior change, or insufficient consumer demand for food safety. To fill the gaps, several opportunities were discussed, including contextualizing policies and regulations, investing in infrastructure, capacity building, and training, and promoting involvement and collaboration among various stakeholders.

Conclusion This study has highlighted gaps and misperceptions that need to be addressed through proper knowledge and awareness to effectively combat foodborne disease challenges. Behavioral change approaches to improve food safety are recommended.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024. Vol. 8, article id 1411318
Keywords [en]
foodborne disease, food value chain, risk perception, participatory, public markets, East Africa
National Category
Food Science Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-535554DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1411318ISI: 001261432400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-535554DiVA, id: diva2:1886935
Available from: 2024-08-05 Created: 2024-08-05 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(949 kB)71 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 949 kBChecksum SHA-512
6ad4a2b3fd869224ee38eb9cac4d72fa4c2109649522644f8d63c4d520baca2ade460a7aa66894a1329796c8cc06a78e8c542a76c4f7968fce383e030255f670
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, Johanna
By organisation
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Food SciencePublic Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 71 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 111 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf