Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Judicial Review and Individual Legal Activism: The Case of Russia in Theoretical Perspective
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of East European Studies.
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation deals with judicial review of governmental action and individual legal activism. It investigates whether judicial protection of individual rights and individual legal activism, within the field of public law, can be seen as an alternative or complement to electoral control of political and administrative powers. To discuss the effect of various standing rules and the potential societal function of public law adjudication, a model for analyzing the character of public law adjudication has been developed. The model allows for a characterization of public law adjudication as either Liberal or Republican, depending on features of standing rules, court proceedings, and court decisions. It concludes that judicial protection of individual rights and individual legal activism within the field of public law can be seen as an alternative or complement to electoral control of political and administrative powers, especially when public trust in, and the powers of, the legislative assembly and political parties is low and decreasing, and if the preconditions for individual legal activism are of such a character that access to justice is available to the larger public and not only a limited group of advantaged individuals.

This theoretical framework is then used to analyse judicial protection of individual rights and individual legal activism in post-Socialist Russia. The results show that the Russian state is best described as authoritarian and that the traditional principal-agent relationship is weak. Thus, in order to strengthen the individual in relation to the state, alternatives for exercising control and participation are required. An analysis of the legislative framework, i.e., the law as it is laid down in the books, shows that Russian administrative law is rights-based and that the character of Russian public law adjudication is closer to the Republican model than the Liberal. However, the Russian support structure is still weak and finds itself in an increasingly inhospitable environment – legally, financially, and politically. In addition, this dissertation concludes that Russia’s membership in the CoE has had an impact on judicial protection of individual rights within the sphere of public law in terms of: improving the legislative framework; developing Russian court jurisprudence referring to the ECHR and to the jurisprudence of the ECtHR; exerting pressure on the Russian state to improve practices of the state bureaucracy; stimulating individual legal activism, and increasing individuals’ knowledge and awareness of their lawful rights and how to implement them.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Faculty of Law & Department of East European Studies, Uppsala University , 2005. , p. 354
Keyword [en]
Constitutional law, Judicial review, judicial protection, individual rights, individual legal activism, democracy, support structure, standing rules, legal aid, public law adjudication, civil society, Council of Europe, access to justice, Russia, post-Socialist, legal transition
Keyword [sv]
Konstitutionell rätt
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Constitutional Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5811ISBN: 91-85031-05-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-5811DiVA, id: diva2:166475
Public defence
2005-05-13, Sal IV, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-04-20 Created: 2005-04-20 Last updated: 2016-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1273 kB)236 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1273 kBChecksum SHA-512
4cc4bb2dd345635843f4a809155bee372c8e0c75d4e53735bafc98ea2acb485ffcf20e82e4e0f6cf45243875c05b08979965d97c0bd87ac7779d1430dbeb9871
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jonsson, Anna
By organisation
Department of LawDepartment of East European Studies
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 236 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 3268 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf