Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Legal Empowerment Paradoxy?: A Critical Exploration of Power Imbalances in the Legal Empowerment Discourse from a Global North/South Perspective
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2020 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Legal empowerment as a theoretical and practical concept has gained increasing attention in international development. Due to the shifting aid paradigm, caused by the rising of South-South cooperation, legal empowerment’s proposed bottom-up character has challenged the larger conventional top-down approaches to development that traditionally have dominated the development agenda. Nevertheless, studies examining legal empowerment have failed to analyse whether the concept is produced in a top-down setting and hence omitted possible power imbalances that the discourse might be hiding. By conducting a critical discourse analysis through applying postcolonial theory, the dissertation critically explores the concept on a sample of public policy documents by two of the largest legal empowerment donors, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. The thesis analyses both how the donors approach the concept and how the discourse may distinguish in their approaches. Furthermore, it examines how power imbalances in the legal empowerment discourse might emerge from a Global North/South perspective. The study finds that the policies from both development banks do not discursively produce legal empowerment in significantly different ways, which moreover forswears the premise that the South-South development cooperation is to be essentially distinctive from the North-South cooperation. Furthermore, the both discourses were found to (re)produce postcolonial narratives that reduce the ‘subjects’ in the discourse into homogenous groups which could somewhat dispute the essence of the concept.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 55
Keywords [en]
Legal Empowerment, North-South, South-South, Development Aid, Postcolonialism
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-403135OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-403135DiVA, id: diva2:1388260
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Master Programme in Political Science
Presentation
2020-01-14, Gamla Torget 6, Uppsala, 23:32 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-01-24 Created: 2020-01-23 Last updated: 2020-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(893 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 893 kBChecksum SHA-512
09851324f642f201981140dddf9b41c6f3d37ff6662c35ebdf25389f1a0da05b70489166f430c18ec437cc772d9644c833a7f31665f05b95bd4cf67071d18539
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Government
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf