Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Strategic Move Towards Power?: A critical discourse analysis of how national leaders of China and the United States frame their foreign trade policies in the trade war
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2020 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
A Strategic Move Towards Power? : A critical discourse analysis of how national leaders of China and the United States frame their foreign trade policies in the trade war (English)
Abstract [en]

By using critical discourse analysis, the purpose of this thesis has been to reveal the hidden power relation behind the discourse on foreign trade policies in the context of the trade war and to examine if grand strategies can be identified in the discourses. The thesis has thus focused on what discourses the national leaders of the United States and China have created and how different words and concepts have been used to form a national strategy on foreign trade policies in the context of the trade war. This thesis has also examined if theories of primacy and neo-neo-isolationism can be found in the discourses produced by the national leaders of China and the United States. The conducted discourse analysis suggests national leaders of China and the United States create discourses to gain an advantage. Where words and concepts were used to strengthen their own position while weakening the other, theories of primacy and neo-neo-isolationism could not be found in the discourses. However, it can be suggested that some parts of the strategies where found. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 84
Keywords [en]
Foreign trade policies, China, The United States, Trade war, Critical discourse analysis, Grand Strategy, Realism, Hegemony, Power
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-91147OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-91147DiVA, id: diva2:1387791
Educational program
Political Science, Master Programme, 120 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-01-23 Created: 2020-01-22 Last updated: 2020-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arpzell, Felicia
By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 129 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf