Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reviewing circular economy rebound effects: The case of online peer-to-peer boat sharing
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Machine Design (Dept.), Integrated Product Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7717-600X
2020 (English)In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, ISSN 0921-3449, E-ISSN 1879-0658, Vol. 5, article id 100028Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Renting instead of buying new products may be seen as the most efficient strategies of the circular economy. However, changes in the consumption inevitably liberates or binds scarce production or consumption factors such as raw materials, money and time which can potentially limit the potential to save resources. This phenomenon is known as environmental rebound effect and is currently under-researched in the context of resource sharing. This paper reviews the magnitude and tendency of environmental rebound effects of peer-to-peer boat sharing platform using a double-spending model (i.e. for lessors as well lessees). We found that environmental rebound effect was experienced by every lessee surveyed (n = 104) and in one-third of lessors (n = 29). 60 % of lessees experienced a rebound of over 20 %, losing one-fifth of the potential reductions in emissions through subsequent consumption behaviour enabled by the economic savings created by sharing resources. International air travel and increases in personal use of the boat were the biggest contributing factors towards environmental rebound effect. Users that increased consumption in these ways experienced a backfire effect in which their annual emissions actually increased. This backfire was experienced by 29 % of lessees with the worst scenario increasing emissions by a factor of over eight. We found statistically significant differences in the rebound of lessors and lessees. Greater awareness and non-economic mechanisms (such as symbolic rewards, information provision and nudging) tailored for lessors and lessees are needed to help prevent the likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of environmental rebound effects from sharing resources.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 5, article id 100028
Keywords [en]
Circular economy, Sharing economy, Rebound effects, Peer-to-peer sharing, Sustainability
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering Economics and Business
Research subject
Industrial Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-266753DOI: 10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100028Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85076556885OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-266753DiVA, id: diva2:1386430
Projects
CE@KTH
Note

QC 20200120

Available from: 2020-01-17 Created: 2020-01-17 Last updated: 2020-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(935 kB)25 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 935 kBChecksum SHA-512
10a80d6bc707e8b5375df57699995ef1fe973d77a25b6dfcb9eadc5ee910733255e4147934e8b8b0ebe6e19485b042805405365fc56066259d2e53ccc8b46610
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Laurenti, Rafael
By organisation
Integrated Product Development
In the same journal
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Other Environmental EngineeringEconomics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 25 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 51 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf