Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults
Univ Granada, Spain.
Univ Granada, Spain.
Univ Leicester, England; NIHR Leicester Biomed Res Ctr, England; Univ South Australia, Australia.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Univ Granada, Spain; Karolinska Inst, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2482-7048
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Scientific Reports, ISSN 2045-2322, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 9, article id 18235Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Large epidemiological studies that use accelerometers for physical behavior and sleep assessment differ in the location of the accelerometer attachment and the signal aggregation metric chosen. This study aimed to assess the comparability of acceleration metrics between commonly-used body-attachment locations for 24 hours, waking and sleeping hours, and to test comparability of PA cut points between dominant and non-dominant wrist. Forty-five young adults (23 women, 18-41 years) were included and GT3X + accelerometers (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) were placed on their right hip, dominant, and non-dominant wrist for 7 days. We derived Euclidean Norm Minus One g (ENMO), Low-pass filtered ENMO (LFENMO), Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and ActiGraph activity counts over 5-second epochs from the raw accelerations. Metric values were compared using a correlation analysis, and by plotting the differences by time of the day. Cut points for the dominant wrist were derived using Lins concordance correlation coefficient optimization in a grid of possible thresholds, using the nondominant wrist estimates as reference. They were cross-validated in a separate sample (N = 36, 10 women, 22-30 years). Shared variances between pairs of acceleration metrics varied across sites and metric pairs (range in r(2) : 0.19-0.97, all p amp;lt; 0.01), suggesting that some sites and metrics are associated, and others are not. We observed higher metric values in dominant vs. non-dominant wrist, thus, we developed cut points for dominant wrist based on ENMO to classify sedentary time (amp;lt;50 mg), light PA (50-110 mg), moderate PA (110-440 mg) and vigorous PA (amp;gt;= 440 mg). Our findings suggest differences between dominant and non-dominant wrist, and we proposed new cut points to attenuate these differences. ENMO and LFENMO were the most similar metrics, and they showed good comparability with MAD. However, counts were not comparable with ENMO, LFENMO and MAD.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP , 2019. Vol. 9, article id 18235
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-162875DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-yISI: 000500812300001PubMedID: 31796778OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-162875DiVA, id: diva2:1382260
Note

Funding Agencies|MINECO/FEDER [DEP2013-47540, DEP2016-79512-R, RYC-2011-09011]; Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [FPU15/02645, FPU16/02760]; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BES-2014-068829, IJCI-2017-33642]; Alicia Koplowitz Foundation; Strategic Research Area Health Care Science, Karolinska Institutet/Umea University; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre; Collaboration for leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East Midlands; Research Council of NorwayResearch Council of Norway [249932/F20]; University of Granada; University of Granada, UGR Research and Knowledge Transfer Fund (PPIT) 2016; Regional Government of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Economy, Knowledge, Entreprises and University; European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)European Union (EU) [SOMM17/6107/UGR, RD16/0022]; SAMID III network, RETICS - PN I + D + I 2017-2021 (Spain); ISCIII-Sub-Directorate General for Research Assessment and Promotion; EXERNET Research Network on Exercise and Health in Special Populations [DEP2005-00046/ACTI]; European UnionEuropean Union (EU) [667302]

Available from: 2020-01-02 Created: 2020-01-02 Last updated: 2020-01-24

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2468 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2468 kBChecksum SHA-512
1c9dd9329fcfae940946e563328dc164bbaff4f4b23b126794ea7ba7c939a82a35423da8b0500ac17188c11167d62fbd4e64ebadfb0a3921ed1ceda367f6d22d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Henriksson, Pontus
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 15 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf