Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bör man automatisera tester? En jämförande studie mellan manuell och automatiserad testning och de krav som skulle kunna ställas på en automatisering
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Is automation of tests an option? A comparative study between manual and automated testing and the requirements that could be placed on an automation (English)
Abstract [en]

Automating test processes is becoming more and more up-to-date and one of the reasons is that manual tests are time-consuming and complicated. The aim of the study is to identify the manual test process in integration systems to see if there can be a value in automating them and which requirements can then form the basis of an automation. Pros and cons of both manual and automated tests are highlighted in the study in order to make a fair comparison between them. The advantages of the automation that has been highlighted have since, together with collected empirical data at the company Pulsen Integration, been used to produce a requirement list for automation. The study addresses whether it is worth automating all processes or whether some of the test activities work better as manual. By looking at Pulsen Integration's testing processes, one could see that some flexible processes are better as manual, while more general activities can be more easily automated. The study has had a qualitative approach and the chosen respondents from Pulsen Integration contributed with information to be able to produce a relevant list of requirements. We believe that the result presented can be generalized to companies in similar context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
Keywords [sv]
Software testing, Manual test, Automated test, Testcases, Requirements management, Requirement specification
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-22254OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-22254DiVA, id: diva2:1380715
Subject / course
Informatics
Available from: 2019-12-19 Created: 2019-12-19 Last updated: 2019-12-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(479 kB)4 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 479 kBChecksum SHA-512
60f471c7155e12b6e5745d1aac423eec9889c9a8f18478af2c70420c3beb6264d59d554736e46b816b5b68cad35fc49bcc8e70899685c1046e63c619bc0d34af
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf