Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En kvantitativ studie av tre länders läroplaner vad gäller arbetsområdet demokrati.: En studie av Sveriges, Englands och Australiens läroplaner och hur de förväntas arbeta med demokratiområdet.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013).
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
A quantitative study of three countries’ curriculums in regards to the democracy field. : A study of Sweden’s, England’s and Australia’s curriculum and how they are expected to work in regards to the democracy field. (English)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this essay is to investigate the Swedish, Australian and English curriculum and how the schools are expected to work with teaching students about democracy. The main procedure of this essay has been reading all the curriculums and then breaking them down into categories. This method has been used to be able to see similarities and differences between the countries and their curriculums. The categories used has been two main ones: The Holistic and The Problematization. The category Problematization has then been broken down into three sub-categories: The System, The Values and The Influence. This method has also been used to be able to see in which category the countries curriculums put the most emphasis in. The conclusion of this essay is that all countries are expected to work with teaching students about democracy but in different ways. The Swedish curriculum puts a lot of emphasis in the category Values, the Australian Curriculum puts a lot of emphasis in teaching their students about the category System and the English one puts a lot of emphasis in Problematization but has an even distribution among the sub-categories.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 59
Keywords [sv]
Läroplan
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-75811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-75811DiVA, id: diva2:1371791
Subject / course
Social and Political Studies
Educational program
Secondary Education Programme: Upper-Secondary School: Social Science (330 ECTS credits)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-11-21 Created: 2019-11-20 Last updated: 2019-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3807 kB)1 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3807 kBChecksum SHA-512
962097f994caed7ac999d7b89dfa0eebd05161dc1f35b7d4d951715ab2e945a9a2e2d8f9e5997d9a39ca8fbf5b39d43422e651df90d2df47eab9e9317fdc6756
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013)
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf