Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Partitioning spatial, environmental, and community drivers of ecosystem functioning
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Landscape Ecology, ISSN 0921-2973, E-ISSN 1572-9761, Vol. 34, no 10, p. 2371-2384Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: Community composition, environmental variation, and spatial structuring can influence ecosystem functioning, and ecosystem service delivery. While the role of space in regulating ecosystem functioning is well recognised in theory, it is rarely considered explicitly in empirical studies.

Objectives: We evaluated the role of spatial structuring within and between regions in explaining the functioning of 36 reference and human-impacted streams.

Methods: We gathered information on regional and local environmental variables, communities (taxonomy and traits), and used variance partitioning analysis to explain seven indicators of ecosystem functioning.

Results: Variation in functional indicators was explained not only by environmental variables and community composition, but also by geographic position, with sometimes high joint variation among the explanatory factors. This suggests spatial structuring in ecosystem functioning beyond that attributable to species sorting along environmental gradients. Spatial structuring at the within-region scale potentially arose from movements of species and materials among habitat patches. Spatial structuring at the between-region scale was more pervasive, occurring both in analyses of individual ecosystem processes and of the full functional matrix, and is likely to partly reflect phenotypic variation in the traits of functionally important species. Characterising communities by their traits rather than taxonomy did not increase the total variation explained, but did allow for a better discrimination of the role of space.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the value of accounting for the role of spatial structuring to increase explanatory power in studies of ecosystem processes, and underpin more robust management of the ecosystem services supported by those processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. Vol. 34, no 10, p. 2371-2384
Keywords [en]
Spatial structuring, Community ecology, Ecosystem processes, Species traits, Variance partitioning
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-165001DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00894-9ISI: 000490066800013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-165001DiVA, id: diva2:1368462
Available from: 2019-11-07 Created: 2019-11-07 Last updated: 2019-11-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(502 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 502 kBChecksum SHA-512
3fe077c3b14c89f78a9b43f4b935ad638bc68840ca1af13123566e4c25e1fd8f4d0e2e63a828ef0dc105679f3efb68fc905d0b5d3e3b9aebacda7f0024f22cf0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ecke, FraukeSponseller, Ryan A.Bundschuh, Mirco
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Landscape Ecology
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf