Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cost Comparison of Repowering Alternatives for Offshore Wind Farms
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences.
2019 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to evaluate different repowering alternatives from the viewpoint of increasing power production from existing offshore wind farms (OWF), as some of the first commissioned OWFs are approaching the end of their expected lifetime. The thesis presents a literature review of components and financial aspects that are of importance for repowering of OWFs. In the literature review, risks and uncertainties regarding repowering are also lifted and analysed. The thesis contains a case study on Horns Rev 1 OWF, where three different repowering scenarios are evaluated by technical and financial performance, aiming to compare the cost of repowering alternatives. The design of the case study is based around previous studies of offshore repowering having focused mainly on achieving the lowest possible levelized cost of energy (LCoE) and highest possible capacity factor, often resulting in suggested repowering utilizing smaller wind turbines than the existing ones.

In order to evaluate the financial viability of repowering alternatives, the software RETScreen Expert was used to estimate the annual energy production (AEP) after losses and calculate the net present value (NPV) and LCoE for lifetime extension and full repowering utilizing different capacity wind turbines. Input values from the literature as well as real wind resource measurements from the site was utilized to achieve as accurate results as possible.

The result of the case study shows that repowering of OWFs have the possibility of providing a very strong business case with all scenarios resulting in a positive NPV as well as lower LCoE than the benchmarked electricity production price. Although the initial investment cost of the different repowering alternatives presented in this thesis still are uncertain to some extent, due to the lack of reliable costs for repowering alternatives, this thesis provides a base for further research regarding the repowering of OWFs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 87
Keywords [en]
Offshore Wind Power Development, Offshore Wind Farm, Offshore Repowering, Lifetime Extension, Decommissioning, Levelized Cost of Energy, Net Present Value, Financial Analysis, Feasibility Study, End of Life Scenario, Annual Energy Production
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-395298OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-395298DiVA, id: diva2:1361788
Educational program
Master Programme in Wind Power Project Management
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-10-17 Created: 2019-10-16 Last updated: 2019-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Cost Comparison of Repowering Alternatives for Offshore Wind Farms(1123 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1123 kBChecksum SHA-512
098e9c980d472635532f371d3a8a80153eceae415654e55379ef34eb55d83e36aa8001e108823bed306a34eac67c2b52bcac2c4ccf1d3927a56b04ff1fad2930
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Earth Sciences
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 742 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf