Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
(forgive us,o life!the sin of Death: A Critical Reading of Michael Riffaterre's Semiotics of Poetry
University of Tromsø, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2400-4124
2011 (English)In: Textual Practice, ISSN 0950-236X, E-ISSN 1470-1308, Vol. 25, no 5, p. 913-939Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objectives of this article are two-fold: in part a presentation of Riffaterres semiotic-based analysis of poetry, and in part an examination of its problems and predicaments, using modern experimental poetry by way of example. Due to the fact that Semiotics of Poetry was introduced to the Anglo-American world at the same moment as a second wave of deconstruction was building up, Riffaterres theory was largely criticised for not adhering to new values, or ignored, despite the value of his semiotics of poetry as an analytical and pedagogical aid in the study of poetry. The problems that present themselves with respect to Riffaterres semiotics of poetry are mainly linked to his formalistic dependence on textuality, which cause him to ignore any factors other than intertextuality in the production of lyric poetry. This would suggest an appreciable limitation in the practicability of this method of gaining an overall grasp of what poetry is. In addition, I shall discuss the problems raised as a result of Riffaterres own hermeneutic practice of interpretation, thus offering a further illustration of the obstacles encountered in attempting to employ his semiotics of poetry. Finally, I shall endeavour to situate this method in a comprehensive poetic analysis, in order to demonstrate its primary practicability as a descriptive discipline

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2011. Vol. 25, no 5, p. 913-939
Keywords [en]
Michael Riffaterre, semiotics, interpretation, textuality, intertextuality, experimental poetry
National Category
General Literature Studies
Research subject
Comparative Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-89587DOI: 10.1080/09502361003687811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-89587DiVA, id: diva2:1361127
Available from: 2019-10-15 Created: 2019-10-15 Last updated: 2020-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(453 kB)341 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 453 kBChecksum SHA-512
b8247f1a47099dfe37663da0c3c9144ba176527822ebb0452ac90f7e235c8a884005c432f7120784e7c5386320089c61c388bcb6f3d35b200a237990b91bba33
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bäckström, Per
In the same journal
Textual Practice
General Literature Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 341 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf