Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Teacher´s Talk about Group Work Assessment before and after Participation in An Intervention
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping, Sweden.
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division for Educational Science and Languages. (BUV, LINA)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1391-3346
2019 (English)In: Creative Education, ISSN 2151-4755, E-ISSN 2151-4771, Vol. 10, no 9, article id 95471Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research has shown that teachers use an indistinct vocabulary, employ few concepts, and expose an embryonic professional language when talking about group work assessment, thus indicating a lack of a professional language. Building on Granström´s three different modes of language use everyday, pseudo-meta- and meta-language, the purpose of this article was to examine the teachers use of languages when talking about group work assessment. Specifically, if and how teachers use of modes of languages are influenced by them partaking in 1) a study about assessment in group work and 2) in an intervention in form of a short educational session. Data were gathered from interviews with eight teachers working in years five and eight in five Swedish compulsory schools and analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The results revealed that all of the teachers use Granstöms mode of languages to a varying degree when talking about assessment in cooperative situations. A core finding was that intervention in the form of a short education influenced the teachers way of talking in a positive way. By participating in the intervention, the teachers developed and expanded their mode of language, thereby promoting the use of a common professional language about group work assessment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 10, no 9, article id 95471
National Category
Pedagogy Didactics Pedagogical Work
Research subject
SOCIAL SCIENCE, Educational science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-14588DOI: 10.4236/ce.2019.109149OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-14588DiVA, id: diva2:1360966
Available from: 2019-10-14 Created: 2019-10-14 Last updated: 2020-01-30

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1404 kB)199 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1404 kBChecksum SHA-512
907fc4e0476f3bca54a1d0c9517037d9c75206246a87eddafc98b1dc23dcb3def943722275523ab161846d9a03c104edb0eb83a59c01b7cb1f0f3fa2f2bd1dee
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forslund Frykedal, Karin
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and Languages
In the same journal
Creative Education
PedagogyDidacticsPedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 199 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 260 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf