Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hierarchies of criteria in NSO board-nomination processes: insights from nomination committees' work
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education. Centre for Sport Policy and Politics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9619-801x
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education. Department of Cultural and Social Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2745-4841
2019 (English)In: European Sport Management Quarterly, ISSN 1618-4742, E-ISSN 1746-031XArticle in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Research question: The purpose of this paper is to create knowledge on board-selection processes and their outcomes in terms of board composition. We address two research questions: (1) What evaluative criteria are at play in board-selection processes; and (2) what hierarchies of criteria are formed when evaluative criteria are ranked? The significance of the study lies in contemporary considerations of good governance, in sport members’ (un)equal access to positions of power, and in how issues of representation relate to the legitimacy of sport governance systems and to broader societal patterns of representation, influence, and democracy.

Research methods: Nomination committees are increasingly used worldwide to further good governance in sport organizations. Our analysis builds on interviews with representatives of 61 out of 71 Swedish national sport organizations’ nomination committees.

Results and Findings: Our study shows that trade-offs are made not between gender and merit, as previously suggested, but between and among a wide variety of representation criteria and a wide variety of efficiency criteria. We show how tensions between criteria result in trade-offs that imply a ranking of criteria into seven types of hierarchies, only one of which prioritizes a representation-based board composition.

Implications: Because rankings of multiple evaluative criteria impact any single criterion of interest (e.g. gender), future studies should take into account the range of evaluative criteria at play. For sport management and policy practitioners alike, we provide a tool to understand and address (in)adequate representation but also an imperative to consider the meaning of adequate representation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2019.
Keywords [en]
Sport governance, representation, democracy, efficiency
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163920DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2019.1672204OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-163920DiVA, id: diva2:1358957
Funder
Swedish National Centre for Research in Sports, P2017-0139Available from: 2019-10-08 Created: 2019-10-08 Last updated: 2019-10-14

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1927 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1927 kBChecksum SHA-512
5f04e119687d2dd42b39d6d3ed0d4ed6d98409a813824a9c8cecb1025421414fb301cddb44d5c5a9dffae32b1ea0fbb0c716b72131e94f1c1e98fc3e1d3b769a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenling, CeciliaFahlén, Josef
By organisation
Department of Education
In the same journal
European Sport Management Quarterly
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf