Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors important for women who breastfeed in public: a content analysis of review data from FeedFinder
Open Lab, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3127-1917
Open Lab, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9472-3805
2016 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 6, no 10, article id e011762Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To examine how the breastfeeding experience is represented by users of FeedFinder (a mobile phone application for finding, reviewing and sharing places to breastfeed in public).

DESIGN: Content analysis using FeedFinder database.

SETTING: FeedFinder, UK, September 2013-June 2015.

METHODS: Reviews obtained through FeedFinder over a period of 21 months were systematically coded using a conventional content analysis approach, average review scores were calculated for the rating criteria in FeedFinder (comfort, hygiene, privacy, baby facilities) and review texts were analysed for sentiment. We used data from Foursquare to describe the type of venues visited and cross-referenced the location of venues with the Indices of Multiple Deprivation.

RESULTS: A total of 1757 reviews were analysed. Of all the reviews obtained, 80% of those were classified as positive, 15.4% were classified as neutral and 4.3% were classified as negative. Important factors that were discussed by women include facilities, service, level of privacy available and qualities of a venue. The majority of venues were classified as cafes (26.4%), shops (24.4%) and pubs (13.4%). Data on IMD were available for 1229 venues mapped within FeedFinder, 23% were located within the most deprived quintile and 16% were located in the least deprived quintile.

CONCLUSIONS: Women create content that is positive and informative when describing their breastfeeding experience in public. Public health bodies and business owners have the potential to use the data from FeedFinder to impact on service provision. Further work is needed to explore the demographic differences that may help to tailor public health interventions aimed at increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2016. Vol. 6, no 10, article id e011762
Keywords [en]
PUBLIC HEALTH, breastfeeding, public breastfeeding
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-258080DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011762ISI: 000391303200138PubMedID: 27797996Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84992754172OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-258080DiVA, id: diva2:1350805
Note

QC 20190912

Available from: 2019-09-12 Created: 2019-09-12 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(905 kB)287 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 905 kBChecksum SHA-512
c0e8467ec04ce54dcf7bc833d787f0950b4360f37593d65d026e53295204b2d586d6402e59cee531fe3384ecc4f6413a2925f732374f447919152c40b87439b1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Comber, RobBalaam, Madeline
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Human Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 287 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 357 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf