Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Component attributes and their importance in decisions and component selection
Örebro University, Sweden.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, ICT, SICS.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5157-8131
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, ICT, SICS.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7879-4371
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Software quality journal, ISSN 0963-9314, E-ISSN 1573-1367, p. 1-27Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Component-based software engineering is a common approach in the development and evolution of contemporary software systems. Different component sourcing options are available, such as: (1) Software developed internally (in-house), (2) Software developed outsourced, (3) Commercial off-the-shelf software, and (4) Open-Source Software. However, there is little available research on what attributes of a component are the most important ones when selecting new components. The objective of this study is to investigate what matters the most to industry practitioners when they decide to select a component. We conducted a cross-domain anonymous survey with industry practitioners involved in component selection. First, the practitioners selected the most important attributes from a list. Next, they prioritized their selection using the Hundred-Dollar ($100) test. We analyzed the results using compositional data analysis. The results of this exploratory analysis showed that cost was clearly considered to be the most important attribute for component selection. Other important attributes for the practitioners were: support of the componentlongevity prediction, and level of off-the-shelf fit to product. Moreover, several practitioners still consider in-house software development to be the sole option when adding or replacing a component. On the other hand, there is a trend to complement it with other component sourcing options and, apart from cost, different attributes factor into their decision. Furthermore, in our analysis, nonparametric tests and biplots were used to further investigate the practitioners’ inherent characteristics. It seems that smaller and larger organizations have different views on what attributes are the most important, and the most surprising finding is their contrasting views on the cost attribute: larger organizations with mature products are considerably more cost aware.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. p. 1-27
Keywords [en]
Component-based software engineering, Component sourcing options, Decision making, Compositional data analysis, Cumulative voting
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-39897DOI: 10.1007/s11219-019-09465-2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-39897DiVA, id: diva2:1350280
Available from: 2019-09-11 Created: 2019-09-11 Last updated: 2019-09-11

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2006 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2006 kBChecksum SHA-512
84db5eb402f9e28f1adb2c18f437d2f8fa54cf5c8f062d7cb68bbff61943ee22c2de5a46a90dd0063f9ec1ed279f1113fbffc3322b72407629cbba407ce4d22a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Papatheocharous, EfiBorg, Markus
By organisation
SICS
In the same journal
Software quality journal
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf