Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Negotiating Authority: Disability, Interactions and Power Relations on Twitter
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work. (DISLIFE)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2647-2869
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Humlab.
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Humlab. University of Helsinki, Department of Cultures.
2019 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, ISSN 1501-7419, E-ISSN 1745-3011, Vol. 21, no 1, p. 238-249Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Social media is often seen as an arena for negotiation of power, where marginalized voices can be given influence in the public debate. This study focuses the use of Twitter for discussions related to disabilities and disability policy in Sweden. The empirical material is gathered through the hashtag (#) “funkpol”, the primary hashtag used to discuss such topics. Empirical data was gathered using a scripted Google spreadsheet. Over a period of 6 months, approximately 10.000 tweets were retrieved. Our findings show nine different categories of twitterers. According to patterns visible in the study, the most active twitterers – the private twitterers – reached out to the established power (advocacy organizations, politicians and media). However, these instances did not respond as much as they were addressed – at least not directly on Twitter. The article shows how private actors are active but not picked up in the public debate. Instead, established power structures prevailed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 21, no 1, p. 238-249
Keywords [en]
power, disabilities, social media, Twitter, authority
National Category
Media Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163094DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.591OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-163094DiVA, id: diva2:1348987
Available from: 2019-09-06 Created: 2019-09-06 Last updated: 2019-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(540 kB)43 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 540 kBChecksum SHA-512
cf72e6ef0cc455f1df75dfa5f102bc0a532500637272b79cbfa7947f0cff83e9578d66e96a79cf09cc0ac8f405be17895cbef1cdfa5feb0e17fdc18a7e59f396
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ineland, JensGelfgren, StefanCocq, Coppélie
By organisation
Department of Social WorkHumlab
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Media Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 43 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 285 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf