Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The development of visually guided stepping
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8429-0177
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5497-4001
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Experimental Brain Research, ISSN 0014-4819, E-ISSN 1432-1106, Vol. 237, no 11, p. 2875-2883Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Adults use vision during stepping and walking to fine-tune foot placement. However, the developmental profile of visually guided stepping is unclear. We asked (1) whether children use online vision to fine-tune precise steps and (2) whether preci- sion stepping develops as part of broader visuomotor development, alongside other fundamental motor skills like reaching. With 6-(N = 11), 7-(N = 11), 8-(N = 11)-year-olds and adults (N = 15), we manipulated visual input during steps and reaches. Using motion capture, we measured step and reach error, and postural stability. We expected (1) both steps and reaches would be visually guided (2) with similar developmental profiles (3) foot placement biases that promote stability, and (4) correlations between postural stability and step error. Children used vision to fine-tune both steps and reaches. At all ages, foot placement was biased (albeit not in the predicted directions). Contrary to our predictions, step error was not correlated with postural stability. By 8 years, children’s step and reach error were adult-like. Despite similar visual control mechanisms, stepping and reaching had different developmental profiles: step error reduced with age whilst reach error was lower and stable with age. We argue that the development of both visually guided and non-visually guided action is limb-specific.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 237, no 11, p. 2875-2883
National Category
Neurology Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-392218DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05629-5ISI: 000490291500011PubMedID: 31471678OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-392218DiVA, id: diva2:1347354
Available from: 2019-08-31 Created: 2019-08-31 Last updated: 2019-11-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1779 kB)264 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1779 kBChecksum SHA-512
52eee5044a05fbf051800357e23ea9bdcbc7f901726cbe1765a8f90ab81004afc8e2f04e0769936047cbc6f834867b8882dc958927cd910c3dbf21daaaf96d8d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mowbray, RachelGottwald, Janna M.
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Experimental Brain Research
NeurologyPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 264 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 125 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf