Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Single institution followed by national implementation of systematic surgical quality control and feedback for radical prostatectomy: a 20-year journey
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1248-5581
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: World journal of urology, ISSN 0724-4983, E-ISSN 1433-8726, Vol. 38, p. 1397-1411Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The demand for objective and outcome-based facts about surgical results after radical prostatectomy (RP) is increasing. Systematic feedback is also essential for each surgeon to improve his/her performance.

Methods: RP outcome data (e.g., pT-stage and margin status) have been registered at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SUH) since 1988 and patient-related outcome measures (PROM) have been registered since 2001. The National Prostate Cancer Registry (NPCR) has covered all Regions in Sweden since 1998 and includes PROM-data from 2008. Initially PROM was on-paper questionnaires but due since 2018 all PROMs are collected electronically. In 2014 an on-line “dashboard” panel was introduced, showing the results for ten quality-control variables in real-time. Since 2017 all RP data on hospital, regional, and national levels are publicly accessible on-line on “www.npcr.se/RATTEN”.

Results: The early PROM-data from SUH have been used for internal quality control. As national clinical and PROM-data from the NPCR have been made accessible on-line and in real-time we have incorporated this into our pre-existing protocol. Our data are now internally available as real-time NPCR reports on the individual surgeons’ results, as well as ePROM data. We can compare the results of each surgeon internally and to other departments’ aggregated data. The public can access data and compare hospital level data on “RATTEN”.

Conclusions: The process of quality control of RP locally at SUH, and nationally through the NPCR, has been long but fruitful. The online design, with direct real-time feedback to the institutions that report the data, is essential.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2020. Vol. 38, p. 1397-1411
Keywords [en]
PROM, Prostate cancer, Quality control, Radical prostatectomy
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-162732DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02887-4ISI: 000534963200008PubMedID: 31388817Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85070231510OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-162732DiVA, id: diva2:1346063
Available from: 2019-08-27 Created: 2019-08-27 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2039 kB)242 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 2039 kBChecksum SHA-512
807746f120e85d8cd087b1130c725c9be98f02e6889ed94303ec95f4350dc53e108b65e5c43fc5addf2ba6fd5a6da451b1acb2139ca95a86022efe45f156a0c8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fransson, Per
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
World journal of urology
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 366 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 514 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf