Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prediction of Partition Coefficients of Environmental Toxins Using Computational Chemistry Methods
Uppsala University, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4240-513x
Uppsala University, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4240-513x
Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Dept Biol Sci & Engn, Sch Chem & Biol Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China.
COSMOl GmbH & Co KG, Leverkusen, Germany; Univ Regensburg, Inst Phys & Theoret Chem, Regensburg, Germany.
2019 (English)In: ACS Omega, ISSN 2470-1343, Vol. 4, no 9, p. 13772-13781Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The partitioning of compounds between aqueous and other phases is important for predicting toxicity. Although thousands of octanol–water partition coefficients have been measured, these represent only a small fraction of the anthropogenic compounds present in the environment. The octanol phase is often taken to be a mimic of the inner parts of phospholipid membranes. However, the core of such membranes is typically more hydrophobic than octanol, and other partition coefficients with other compounds may give complementary information. Although a number of (cheap) empirical methods exist to compute octanol–water (log kOW) and hexadecane–water (log kHW) partition coefficients, it would be interesting to know whether physics-based models can predict these crucial values more accurately. Here, we have computed log kOW and log kHW for 133 compounds from seven different pollutant categories as well as a control group using the solvation model based on electronic density (SMD) protocol based on Hartree–Fock (HF) or density functional theory (DFT) and the COSMO-RS method. For comparison, XlogP3 (log kOW) values were retrieved from the PubChem database, and KowWin log kOW values were determined as well. For 24 of these compounds, log kOW was computed using potential of mean force (PMF) calculations based on classical molecular dynamics simulations. A comparison of the accuracy of the methods shows that COSMO-RS, KowWin, and XlogP3 all have a root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) from the experimental data of ≈0.4 log units, whereas the SMD protocol has an rmsd of 1.0 log units using HF and 0.9 using DFT. PMF calculations yield the poorest accuracy (rmsd = 1.1 log units). Thirty-six out of 133 calculations are for compounds without known log kOW, and for these, we provide what we consider a robust prediction, in the sense that there are few outliers, by averaging over the methods. The results supplied may be instrumental when developing new methods in computational ecotoxicity. The log kHW values are found to be strongly correlated to log kOW for most compounds.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 4, no 9, p. 13772-13781
National Category
Theoretical Chemistry
Research subject
Chemistry with Specialisation in Theoretical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-391706DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01277ISI: 000485168200017PubMedID: 31497695OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-391706DiVA, id: diva2:1345601
Funder
Swedish Research Council, SNIC2017-12-41Available from: 2019-08-26 Created: 2019-08-26 Last updated: 2019-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(948 kB)33 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 948 kBChecksum SHA-512
bbb974e82d72f43aa3f03adcf85bc1654cceb30a1080b008d23df2481fb139de225a6e45769eaec99ed103fe84a9e23d03e4b4b048b2ff7dfd8cc9c31e533c7d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Van der Spoel, DavidManzetti, Sergio
By organisation
Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLabComputational Biology and Bioinformatics
Theoretical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 33 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf