Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The trend of radiological severity of hip fractures over a 30 years period: a cohort study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, E-ISSN 1471-2474, Vol. 20, no 1, article id 358Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in operative techniques and preoperative care, proximal femur fractures (PFF) still represent a great public health problem. Displacement and fracture stability have been assumed as important determinants of treatment modality and outcome in such fractures. Purpose of this study was to determine whether the radiological severity of PFF fractures has increased over time.

METHODS: In a cohort study, the plain radiographs of all patients with PFF aged over 50 years who were admitted to Umeå University Hospital in 1981/82, 2002 and 2012 were recruited to examine the types of fractures.

RESULTS: The ratio of undisplaced to displaced femoral neck (FN) fractures was 30 to 70% in 1981/82, 28 to 72% in 2002 and 25 to 75% in 2012. The ratio of stable to unstable intertrochanteric (IT) fractures was 64 to 36% in 1981/82, 68 to 32% in 2002 and 75 to 25% in 2012. The ratio of simple to comminute subtrochanteric fractures was 35 to 65% in 1981/82, 16 to 84% in 2002 and 12 to 88% in 2012. In both FN and IT fractures we found no statistical difference among these 3 study periods, p = 0.67 and p = 0.40. In subtrochanteric fractures we saw a tendency towards more comminute subtrochanteric fractures (1981/82 to 2012), p = 0.09.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant increment in the radiological severity of FN and IT over a 30 years' period. However, there was tendency towards an increase in comminute subtrochanteric fractures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 20, no 1, article id 358
Keywords [en]
Hip fracture, Proximal femoral fracture, Severity, Trend
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-162379DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2739-1ISI: 000479253600005PubMedID: 31391031Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85071282167OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-162379DiVA, id: diva2:1343654
Available from: 2019-08-19 Created: 2019-08-19 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(607 kB)257 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 607 kBChecksum SHA-512
d6a7c6af36a562da756d969e2b07e69a664107bf839a3fb4c54064ef4bc2d44d12d3c26af80b28e89017139d819a2cc8c11f12e90426ae5fb0d301d6dd75aaa4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Farhang, MehdyMukka, SebastianBergström, UlricaSvensson, OlleSayed-Noor, Arkan S.
By organisation
Orthopaedics
In the same journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 257 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 567 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf